From 0c1a1a6d3c19a7806f7178d0095f9b4245e51aeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bsenjean Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:00:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Minor changes. --- Manuscript/FarDFT.tex | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex b/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex index e0f32ee..5ec37d7 100644 --- a/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex +++ b/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex @@ -617,7 +617,9 @@ As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Ew_H2}, the SGIC-eVWN5 is slightly less concave than i For a more qualitative picture, Table \ref{tab:BigTab_H2} reports excitation energies for various methods and basis sets. In particular, we report the excitation energies obtained with GOK-DFT in the zero-weight limit (\ie, $\ew{} = 0$) and for the equi-ensemble (\ie, $\ew{} = 1/2$). -For comparison purposes, we also report the linear interpolation method (LIM) excitation energies, \cite{Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016} which are defined as +For comparison purposes, we also report the linear interpolation method (LIM), \cite{Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016} which is +a pragmatic way of getting weight-independent +excitation energies defined as \begin{equation} \Ex{\LIM}{(1)} = 2 (\E{}{\ew{}=1/2} - \E{}{\ew{}=0}), \end{equation}