diff --git a/g.tex b/g.tex index 854cbf9..941fdd9 100644 --- a/g.tex +++ b/g.tex @@ -543,29 +543,19 @@ This probability is given by = \sum_{\ket{i_1} \in \cD_{I_0}} \cdots \sum_{\ket{i_{n-1}} \in \cD_{I_0}} p_{I_0 \to i_1} \ldots p_{i_{n-2} \to i_{n-1}} p_{i_{n-1} \to I}. \ee -Since the sums are restricted to states belonging to the domain it is convenient to introduce a projector for over each domain +Since the sums are restricted to states belonging to the domain, it is convenient to introduce a projector over each domain \be \label{eq:pi} - P_I = \sum_{\ket{i} \in \cD_I} \dyad{i}{i}. + P_I = \sum_{\ket{i} \in \cD_I} \dyad{i}{i}, \ee -and, also, -the projection of the operator $T^+$ over the domain, \ie, -\be - T^+_I= P_I T^+ P_I. -\ee -Th operator $T^+_I$ governs the dynamics of the walkers trapped in the domain $\cD_{I}$, -see Eq.(\ref{eq:pij}) where $T^+$ is now restricted to the domain. +as well as the projection of $T^+$ over $\cD_I$, \ie, $T^+_I = P_I T^+ P_I$, which governs the dynamics of the walkers trapped in this domain. +%see Eq.~\eqref{eq:pij} where $T^+$ is now restricted to the domain. Using Eqs.~\eqref{eq:pij} and \eqref{eq:eq1C}, the probability can be rewritten as \be \label{eq:eq3C} \cP_{I_0 \to I}(n) = \frac{1}{\PsiG_{I_0}} \mel{I_0}{\qty(T^+_{I_0})^{n-1} F^+_{I_0}}{I} \PsiG_{I}, \ee -where the operator -\be -\label{eq:Fi} - F^+_I = P_I T^+ (1-P_I), -\ee -corresponding to the last move connecting the inside and outside regions of the domain, has the following matrix elements: +where the operator $F^+_I = P_I T^+ (1-P_I)$, corresponding to the last move connecting the inside and outside regions of the domain, has the following matrix elements: \be (F^+_I)_{ij} = \begin{cases} @@ -582,9 +572,7 @@ the probability of being trapped $n$ times in $\cD_{I}$, just by summing over al \label{eq:PiN} P_{I}(n) = \frac{1}{\PsiG_{I}} \mel{ I }{ \qty(T^+_{I})^{n-1} F^+_{I} }{ \PsiG }. \ee -The normalization to one of this probability can be verified -by using -the fact that +The normalization of this probability can be verified using the fact that \be \label{eq:relation} \qty(T^+_{I})^{n-1} F^+_I = \qty(T^+_{I})^{n-1} T^+ - \qty(T^+_I)^n,