typo

CCvsMBPT.tex

@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ More specifically, we have shown how to recast $GW$ and BSE as non-linear CC-lik
 The conventional and CC-based versions of the BSE and $GW$ schemes that we have described in the present work have been implemented in the electronic structure package QuAcK \cite{QuAcK} (available at \url{https://github.com/pfloos/QuAcK}) with which we have numerically checked these exact equivalences.
 Similitudes between BSE@$GW$ and STEOM-CC have been also highlighted, and may explain the reliability of BSE@$GW$ for the computation of optical excitations in molecular systems. 
 We hope that the present work may provide a path for the computation of ground- and excited-state properties (such as nuclear gradients) within the $GW$ \cite{Lazzeri_2008,Faber_2011b,Yin_2013,Montserrat_2016,Zhenglu_2019} and BSE \cite{IsmailBeigi_2003,Caylak_2021,Knysh_2022} frameworks, hence broadening the applicability of these formalisms in computational photochemistry.
-Thanks to the connections between CC and $GW$, it could also provide new directions for the development of multireference GW methods. \cite{Lyakh_2012,Evangelista_2018}
+Thanks to the connections between CC and $GW$, it could also provide new directions for the development of multireference $GW$ methods. \cite{Lyakh_2012,Evangelista_2018}
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 %\section*{Supplementary Material}