small corrections

CCvsMBPT.bib

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 %% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
 %% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
 
-%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2022-10-11 11:00:19 +0200 
+%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2022-10-11 12:06:57 +0200 
 
 
 %% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8) 

CCvsMBPT.tex

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ Because RPA corresponds to a resummation of all ring diagrams, it is adequate in
 
 Roughly speaking, the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism \cite{Salpeter_1951,Strinati_1988,Blase_2018,Blase_2020} of many-body perturbation theory \cite{Martin_2016} can be seen as a cheap and efficient way of introducing correlation in order to go \textit{beyond} RPA physics.
 In the ph channel, BSE is commonly performed on top of a $GW$ calculation \cite{Hedin_1965,Aryasetiawan_1998,Onida_2002,Reining_2017,Golze_2019,Bruneval_2021} from which one extracts the quasiparticle energies as well as the dynamically-screened Coulomb potential $W$. 
-Practically, $GW$ produces accurate ``charged'' excitations and provides a faithful description of the fundamental gap, while the remaining excitonic effect (\ie, the stabilization provided by the attraction of the excited electron and its hole left behind) is caught via BSE, hence producing accurate ``neutral'' excitations.
+Practically, $GW$ produces accurate ``charged'' excitations providing a faithful description of the fundamental gap, while the remaining excitonic effect (\ie, the stabilization provided by the attraction of the excited electron and its hole left behind) is caught via BSE, hence producing overall accurate ``neutral'' excitations.
 BSE@$GW$ has been shown to be highly successful to compute low-lying excited states of various natures (charge transfer, Rydberg, valence, etc) in molecular systems with a very attractive accuracy/cost ratio.\cite{Rohlfing_1999a,Horst_1999,Puschnig_2002,Tiago_2003,Rocca_2010,Boulanger_2014,Jacquemin_2015a,Bruneval_2015,Jacquemin_2015b,Hirose_2015,Jacquemin_2017a,Jacquemin_2017b,Rangel_2017,Krause_2017,Gui_2018,Blase_2018,Liu_2020,Blase_2020,Holzer_2018a,Holzer_2018b,Loos_2020e,Loos_2021}
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ BSE@$GW$ has been shown to be highly successful to compute low-lying excited sta
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 Interestingly, RPA has strong connections with coupled-cluster (CC) theory, \cite{Freeman_1977,Scuseria_2008,Jansen_2010,Scuseria_2013,Peng_2013,Berkelbach_2018,Rishi_2020} the workhorse of molecular electronic structure when one is looking for high accuracy. \cite{Cizek_1966,Paldus_1972,Crawford_2000,Piecuch_2002,Bartlett_2007,Shavitt_2009} 
 
-In a landmark paper, Scuseria \textit{et al.} \cite{Scuseria_2008} have proven that ring CC with doubles (rCCD) is equivalent to RPA with exchange (RPAx) for the computation of the correlation energy, which solidifies the numerical evidences provided by Freeman many years before. \cite{Freeman_1977}
+In a landmark paper, Scuseria \textit{et al.} \cite{Scuseria_2008} have proven that ring CC with doubles (rCCD) is equivalent to RPA with exchange (RPAx) for the computation of the correlation energy, solidifying in the process the numerical evidences provided by Freeman many years before. \cite{Freeman_1977}
 Assuming the existence of $\bX{}{-1}$ (which can be proven as long as the RPAx problem is stable \cite{Scuseria_2008}), this proof can be quickly summarized starting from the RPAx linear eigensystem
 \begin{equation}
 	\label{eq:RPA}
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ Substituting Eq.~\eqref{eq:RPA_1} into Eq.~\eqref{eq:RPA_2} yields the following
 \begin{equation}
 	\bB{}{} + \bA{}{} \cdot \bT{}{} + \bT{}{} \cdot \bA{}{} + \bT{}{} \cdot \bB{}{} \cdot \bT{}{} = \bO
 \end{equation}
-that matches the well-known rCCD amplitude (or residual) equations
+that matches the rCCD amplitude (or residual) equations
 \begin{multline}
 \label{eq:rCCD}
 	r_{ij}^{ab} 
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ which exactly matches Eq.~\eqref{eq:RPA_1}.
 Although the excitation energies of this approximate EOM-rCCD scheme are equal to the RPAx ones, it has been shown that the transition amplitudes (or residues) are distinct and only agrees at the lowest order in the Coulomb interaction. \cite{Emrich_1981,Berkelbach_2018}
 
 As we shall see below, the connection between a ph eigensystem with the structure of Eq.~\eqref{eq:RPA} and a set of CC-like amplitude equations does not hold only for RPAx as it is actually quite general and can be applied to most ph problems, such as time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT), \cite{Runge_1984,Casida_1995} BSE, and many others.
-This has been also extended to the pp and hh sectors by Peng \textit{et al.} \cite{Peng_2013} and Scuseria \textit{et al.} \cite{Scuseria_2013} 
+This has been also extended to the pp and hh sectors independently by Peng \textit{et al.} \cite{Peng_2013} and Scuseria \textit{et al.} \cite{Scuseria_2013} 
 (See also Ref.~\onlinecite{Berkelbach_2018} for the extension to excitation energies for the pp and hh channels.)
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ Therefore, following the derivation detailed in Sec.~\ref{sec:RPAx}, one can sho
 \begin{equation}
 	\Ec^\text{BSE} = \frac{1}{4} \Tr(\bOm{}{\BSE} - \bA{}{\BSE}) = \frac{1}{4} \sum_{ijab} \wERI{ij}{ab} \tilde{t}_{ij}^{ab} 
 \end{equation}
-can be equivalently obtained via a set of rCCD-like amplitude equations $\tilde{t}_{ij}^{ab}$, where one substitutes in Eq.~\eqref{eq:rCCD} the HF orbital energies by the $GW$ quasiparticle energies and all the antisymmetrized two-electron integrals $\dbERI{pq}{rs}$ by $\wERI{pq}{rs} = \dbERI{pq}{rs} - W_{ps,qr}^\text{stat}$, \ie,
+can be equivalently obtained via a set of rCCD-like amplitude equations, where one substitutes in Eq.~\eqref{eq:rCCD} the HF orbital energies by the $GW$ quasiparticle energies and all the antisymmetrized two-electron integrals $\dbERI{pq}{rs}$ by $\wERI{pq}{rs} = \dbERI{pq}{rs} - W_{ps,qr}^\text{stat}$, \ie,
 \begin{multline}
 \label{eq:rCCD-BSE}
 	\Tilde{r}_{ij}^{ab}
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ Because $GW$ is able to capture key correlation effects as illustrated above, it
 Connections between approximate IP/EA-EOM-CC schemes and the $GW$ approximation have been already studied in details by Lange and Berkelbach, \cite{Lange_2018} but we believe that the present work proposes a different perspective on this particular subject as we derive genuine CC equations that do not decouple the 2h1p and 2p1h sectors.
 Note also that the procedure described below can be applied to other approximate self-energies such as the second-order Green's function (or second Born) \cite{Stefanucci_2013,Ortiz_2013,Phillips_2014,Rusakov_2014,Hirata_2015} or $T$-matrix.\cite{Romaniello_2012,Zhang_2017,Li_2021b,Loos_2022}
 
-Quite unfortunately, there are several ways of computing $GW$ quasiparticle energies.
+Quite unfortunately, there are several ways of computing $GW$ quasiparticle energies. \cite{Loos_2018b}
 Within the perturbative $GW$ scheme (commonly known as $G_0W_0$), the quasiparticle energies are obtained via a one-shot procedure (with or without linearization).
 \cite{Strinati_1980,Hybertsen_1985a,Hybertsen_1986,Godby_1988,Linden_1988,Northrup_1991,Blase_1994,Rohlfing_1995,Shishkin_2007}
 Partial self-consistency can be attained via the \textit{``eigenvalue''} self-consistent $GW$ (ev$GW$)  \cite{Hybertsen_1986,Shishkin_2007,Blase_2011,Faber_2011,Rangel_2016,Gui_2018} or the quasiparticle self-consistent $GW$ (qs$GW$) \cite{Faleev_2004,vanSchilfgaarde_2006,Kotani_2007,Ke_2011,Kaplan_2016} schemes.
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ The quasiparticle energies $\e{p}{GW}$ are thus provided by the eigenvalues of $
 	\bSig{}{\GW} = \bV{}{\text{2h1p}} \cdot \bT{}{\text{2h1p}} + \bV{}{\text{2p1h}} \cdot \bT{}{\text{2p1h}} 
 \end{equation}
 Again, similarly to the dynamical equations defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:GW} which requires the diagonalization of the dRPA eigenproblem [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:dRPA}], the CC equations reported in Eqs.~\eqref{eq:r_2h1p} and \eqref{eq:r_2p1h} can be solved with $\order*{N^6}$ cost by defining judicious intermediates.
-The $G_0W_0$ quasiparticle energies can be easily obtained via the procedure described in Ref.~\onlinecite{Monino_2022} by solving the previous equation for each value of $p$ separately.
+The $G_0W_0$ quasiparticle energies can be easily obtained via the procedure described in Ref.~\onlinecite{Monino_2022} by solving the previous equations for each value of $p$ separately.
 
 %======================
 %\subsection{EE-EOM-CCD}
@@ -719,10 +719,10 @@ The $G_0W_0$ quasiparticle energies can be easily obtained via the procedure des
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 \section{Conclusion}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-Here, we have unveiled exact similarities between the BSE formalism and the $GW$ approximation from many-body perturbation theory and CC theory at the ground- and excited-state levels.
+Here, we have unveiled exact similarities between many-body perturbation and CC theories at the ground- and excited-state levels.
 The conventional and CC-based versions of the BSE and $GW$ schemes that we have described in the present work have been implemented in the electronic structure package QuAcK \cite{QuAcK} (available at \url{https://github.com/pfloos/QuAcK}) with which we have numerically checked these exact equivalences.
-Similitudes between BSE@$GW$ and the STEOM-CC method have been put forward.
-We hope that the present work may provide a path for the computation of ground- and excited-state properties (such as nuclear gradients) within the $GW$ and BSE frameworks.
+Similitudes between BSE@$GW$ and STEOM-CC have been put forward.
+We hope that the present work may provide a path for the computation of ground- and excited-state properties (such as nuclear gradients) within the $GW$ and BSE frameworks, and broaden the applicability of Green's function methods in the molecular electronic structure community and beyond.
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 %\section*{Supplementary Material}