Toto typos
This commit is contained in:
parent
b2f4430d58
commit
45e72c53f7
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ Finally, our conclusions are drawn in Sec.~\ref{sec:conclusion}.
|
|||||||
\subsection{Selected configuration interaction calculations}
|
\subsection{Selected configuration interaction calculations}
|
||||||
\label{sec:SCI}
|
\label{sec:SCI}
|
||||||
For the SCI calculations, we rely on the CIPSI algorithm implemented in QUANTUM PACKAGE, \cite{Garniron_2019} which iteratively select determinants in the FCI space.
|
For the SCI calculations, we rely on the CIPSI algorithm implemented in QUANTUM PACKAGE, \cite{Garniron_2019} which iteratively select determinants in the FCI space.
|
||||||
To treat electronic states on equal footing, we use a state-averaged formalism where the ground and excited states are expanded with the same set of determinants but with different CI coefficients.
|
To treat electronic states on an equal footing, we use a state-averaged formalism where the ground and excited states are expanded with the same set of determinants but with different CI coefficients.
|
||||||
Note that the determinant selection for these states are performed simultaneously via the protocol described in Refs.~\onlinecite{Scemama_2019,Garniron_2019}.
|
Note that the determinant selection for these states are performed simultaneously via the protocol described in Refs.~\onlinecite{Scemama_2019,Garniron_2019}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For a given size of the variational wave function and for each electronic state, the CIPSI energy is the sum of two terms: the variational energy obtained by diagonalization of the CI matrix in the reference space $E_\text{var}$ and a second-order perturbative correction $E_\text{PT2}$ which estimates the contribution of the external determinants that are not included in the variational space at a given iteration.
|
For a given size of the variational wave function and for each electronic state, the CIPSI energy is the sum of two terms: the variational energy obtained by diagonalization of the CI matrix in the reference space $E_\text{var}$ and a second-order perturbative correction $E_\text{PT2}$ which estimates the contribution of the external determinants that are not included in the variational space at a given iteration.
|
||||||
@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ In some cases, we have also computed (singlet and triplet) excitation energies a
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
To avoid having to perform multi-reference CC calculations or high-level CC calculations in the restricted open-shell or unrestricted formalisms, it is worth mentioning that, for the {\Dfour} arrangement, we have considered the lowest \textit{closed-shell} singlet state {\Aoneg} as reference.
|
To avoid having to perform multi-reference CC calculations or high-level CC calculations in the restricted open-shell or unrestricted formalisms, it is worth mentioning that, for the {\Dfour} arrangement, we have considered the lowest \textit{closed-shell} singlet state {\Aoneg} as reference.
|
||||||
Hence, the open-shell ground state {\sBoneg} and the {\Btwog} state appear as a de-excitation and an excitation, respectively.
|
Hence, the open-shell ground state {\sBoneg} and the {\Btwog} state appear as a de-excitation and an excitation, respectively.
|
||||||
With respect to {\Aoneg}, {\sBoneg} has a dominant double excitation character, while {\Btwog} have a dominant single excitation character, hence their contrasting convergence behaviors with respect to the order of the CC expansion (see below).
|
With respect to {\Aoneg}, {\sBoneg} has a dominant double excitation character, while {\Btwog} has a dominant single excitation character, hence their contrasting convergence behaviors with respect to the order of the CC expansion (see below).
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user