xeon
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9eaab35b3
commit
2511d193c3
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||||||
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
||||||
%% https://bibdesk.sourceforge.io/
|
%% https://bibdesk.sourceforge.io/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2022-03-17 21:43:00 +0100
|
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2022-03-23 22:35:50 +0100
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
||||||
|
@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ These errors could be alleviated by using a RAS space.}
|
|||||||
%%% TABLE III %%%
|
%%% TABLE III %%%
|
||||||
\begin{table}
|
\begin{table}
|
||||||
\caption{Wall times (in seconds) for the computation of the (ground-state) second-order (PT2) and third-order (PT3) energies of benzene.
|
\caption{Wall times (in seconds) for the computation of the (ground-state) second-order (PT2) and third-order (PT3) energies of benzene.
|
||||||
Calculations have been performed in the frozen-core approximation and with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set on an AMD Zen3 node (see main text).}
|
Calculations have been performed in the frozen-core approximation and with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set on an Intel Xeon node (see main text).}
|
||||||
\label{tab:timings}
|
\label{tab:timings}
|
||||||
\begin{ruledtabular}
|
\begin{ruledtabular}
|
||||||
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
|
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
|
||||||
@ -612,13 +612,13 @@ These errors could be alleviated by using a RAS space.}
|
|||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{timings}
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{timings}
|
||||||
\caption{Ratio $t_\text{PT3}/t_\text{PT2}$ of the wall times associated with the computation of the third- and second-order energies as a function of the total number of contracted and uncontracted external configurations for benzene (see Table \ref{tab:timings} for raw data).
|
\caption{Ratio $t_\text{PT3}/t_\text{PT2}$ of the wall times associated with the computation of the third- and second-order energies as a function of the total number of contracted and uncontracted external configurations for benzene (see Table \ref{tab:timings} for raw data).
|
||||||
Calculations have been performed in the frozen-core approximation and with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set on an AMD Zen3 node (see main text).}
|
Calculations have been performed in the frozen-core approximation and with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set on an Intel Xeon node node (see main text).}
|
||||||
\label{fig:timings}
|
\label{fig:timings}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
%%% %%% %%% %%%
|
%%% %%% %%% %%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Table \ref{tab:timings} reports the evolution of the wall times associated with the computation of the second- and third-order energies in benzene with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis and within the frozen-core approximation (42 electrons and 414 basis functions) for increasingly large active spaces.
|
Table \ref{tab:timings} reports the evolution of the wall times associated with the computation of the second- and third-order energies in benzene with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis and within the frozen-core approximation (42 electrons and 414 basis functions) for increasingly large active spaces.
|
||||||
All these calculations have been performed on an AMD Zen3 node \alert{with...}
|
All these calculations have been performed on an Intel Xeon E5-2670 node with 8 physical cores at 2.6Ghz node and 64GB of memory.
|
||||||
It is particularly instructive to study the wall time ratio as the number of (contracted and uncontracted) external configuration grows (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:timings}).
|
It is particularly instructive to study the wall time ratio as the number of (contracted and uncontracted) external configuration grows (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:timings}).
|
||||||
Overall, the PT3 step takes between 5 and 10 times longer than the PT2 step for the active spaces that we have considered here, which usually affordable for these kinds of calculations.
|
Overall, the PT3 step takes between 5 and 10 times longer than the PT2 step for the active spaces that we have considered here, which usually affordable for these kinds of calculations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user