diff --git a/BSE-PES.tex b/BSE-PES.tex
index a5821fc..d33485a 100644
--- a/BSE-PES.tex
+++ b/BSE-PES.tex
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
 
 \begin{document}	
 
-\title{Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Potential Energy Surfaces}
+\title{Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Energies}
 
 \author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois \surname{Loos}}
 	\email{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
@@ -186,10 +186,12 @@ The combination of the many-body Green's function $GW$ and the Bethe-Salpeter eq
 The BSE formalism can also be employed to compute ground-state correlation energies thanks to the adiabatic-connection fluctuation-dissipation theorem (ACFDT).
 Here, we study the topology of the ground-state potential energy surfaces (PES) of several diatomic molecules near their equilibrium bond length. 
 Thanks to comparisons with state-of-art computational approaches, we show that ACFDT@BSE is surprisingly accurate, and can even compete with coupled cluster methods in terms of total energies and equilibrium bond distances for the systems considered here.  
-However, we sometimes observe unphysical irregularities on the ground-state PES in relation with the appearance of satellite resonances with a weight similar to that of the $GW$ quasiparticle peak.
+However, we sometimes observe unphysical irregularities on the ground-state PES in relation with the appearance of satellite resonances with a weight similar to that of the $GW$ quasiparticle peak.\\
+\bigskip
 \begin{center}
 	\boxed{\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{TOC}}
 \end{center}
+\bigskip
 \end{abstract}
 
 \maketitle
@@ -545,7 +547,7 @@ The error (in \%) compared to the reference CC3 values are reported in square br
 	CCSD			&	40.382[$+0.00\%$]	&	69.845[$-0.18\%$]	&	372.580[$-2.89\%$]	&	370.764[$-2.99\%$]	&	470.627[$-4.81\%$]	&	455.214[$-4.68\%$]	&	432.856[$-3.27\%$]	&	644.001[$-3.72\%$]	\\
 	CC2				&	33.259[$-17.64\%$]	&	57.289[$-18.13\%$]	&	376.712[$-1.82\%$]	&	356.909[$-6.61\%$]	&	488.017[$-1.29\%$]	&	465.492[$-2.53\%$]	&	427.285[$-4.51\%$]	&	654.878[$-2.09\%$]	\\
 	MP2				&	33.164[$-17.87\%$]	&	57.930[$-17.21\%$]	&	372.997[$-2.79\%$]	&	355.652[$-6.94\%$]	&	477.951[$-3.33\%$]	&	455.020[$-4.72\%$]	&	421.600[$-5.78\%$]	&	644.349[$-3.67\%$]	\\
-	BSE@{\GOWO}@HF	&	46.498[$+15.15\%$]	&	78.075[$+11.58\%$]	&	388.907[$+1.36\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	\\
+	BSE@{\GOWO}@HF	&	46.498[$+15.15\%$]	&	78.075[$+11.58\%$]	&	388.907[$+1.36\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	675.701[$+1.02\%$]	\\
 	RPA@{\GOWO}@HF	&	57.567[$+42.56\%$]	&	101.092[$+44.47\%$]	&	473.053[$+23.29\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	xxx.xxx[$+0.00\%$]	&	794.324[$+18.76\%$]	\\
 	RPAx@HF			&	37.886[$-6.18\%$]	&	65.203[$-6.82\%$]	&	343.604[$-10.45\%$]	&	344.249[$-9.93\%$]	&	427.170[$-13.60\%$]	&	416.315[$-12.83\%$]	&	399.060[$-10.82\%$]	&	586.090[$-12.38\%$]	\\
 	RPA@HF			&	57.332[$+41.98\%$]	&	100.164[$+43.15\%$]	&	465.905[$+21.43\%$]	&	442.675[$+15.83\%$]	&	569.384[$+15.17\%$]	&	555.857[$+16.39\%$]	&	537.685[$+20.16\%$]	&	781.323[$+16.81\%$]	\\
diff --git a/Data/CO_GS_VQZ.pdf b/Data/CO_GS_VQZ.pdf
index e8ebd8f..f567df4 100644
Binary files a/Data/CO_GS_VQZ.pdf and b/Data/CO_GS_VQZ.pdf differ
diff --git a/SI/BSE-PES-SI.tex b/SI/BSE-PES-SI.tex
index 1e4690e..d7efa7d 100644
--- a/SI/BSE-PES-SI.tex
+++ b/SI/BSE-PES-SI.tex
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
 
 \begin{document}	
 
-\title{Supporting Information for ``Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Potential Energy Surfaces''}
+\title{Supporting Information for \\ ``Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Energies''}
 
 \author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois \surname{Loos}}
 	\email{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}