manu_with_pic

This commit is contained in:
linjiez 2019-10-04 14:31:55 +02:00
parent 5c5312d0f1
commit 676302181e

View File

@ -273,14 +273,14 @@ As shown in Figure \ref{fig:mass_spec}, we didnt get UH$^+$ but it was detect
As displayed in Figure \ref{fig:mass_spec}, the intensity of fragments (H$_2$O)$_{n=2-4}$UH$^+$ increase with the number of n which is in line with the results in experiment. It indicates the second lowest-energy cluster (H$_2$O)$_7$UH$^+$ has more chances to lose three water molecules than to lose six water molecules. The intensity of fragment (H$_2$O)$_5$UH$^+$ is close to it of fragment (H$_2$O)$_4$UH$^+$ in theory which agree with the one in experiment. The intensity of fragment (H$_2$O)$_6$UH$^+$ increases a lot compared with these of (H$_2$O)$_{n=2-5}$UH$^+$ in the calculated results but it is not so high in experiment, which indicates in our simulations, the dissociation of the second lowest-energy cluster (H$_2$O)$_7$UH$^+$ losing one water molecule is dominant. The parent cluster (H$_2$O)$_7$UH$^+$ has the highest ratio among all fragments, which is fully consistent with it in experiment. From the analyses of the mass spectrum in theory and experiment, it implies our simulations can quantitatively describe the fragment ratios.
\begin{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{subfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.4\linewidth]{figure/mass_spec.eps}
% \raggedright
\label{fig:sub1}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.4\linewidth]{figure/mass_spec.eps}
% \raggedright
\label{fig:sub1}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figure/mass-experiment.png}