mirror of
https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker
synced 2024-08-29 15:23:40 +02:00
Fix typo: 'RBS filling' => 'RSB filling' (#237)
This commit is contained in:
parent
0009c0d473
commit
afb36c519d
@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ check_variant2_linux()
|
|||||||
if [ "$pvulnstatus_last_cve" != "$cve" ]; then
|
if [ "$pvulnstatus_last_cve" != "$cve" ]; then
|
||||||
# explain what's needed for this CPU
|
# explain what's needed for this CPU
|
||||||
if is_vulnerable_to_empty_rsb; then
|
if is_vulnerable_to_empty_rsb; then
|
||||||
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "IBRS+IBPB or retpoline+IBPB+RBS filling, is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"
|
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "IBRS+IBPB or retpoline+IBPB+RSB filling, is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"
|
||||||
explain "To mitigate this vulnerability, you need either IBRS + IBPB, both requiring hardware support from your CPU microcode in addition to kernel support, or a kernel compiled with retpoline and IBPB, with retpoline requiring a retpoline-aware compiler (re-run this script with -v to know if your version of gcc is retpoline-aware) and IBPB requiring hardware support from your CPU microcode. You also need a recent-enough kernel that supports RSB filling if you plan to use retpoline. For Skylake+ CPUs, the IBRS + IBPB approach is generally preferred as it guarantees complete protection, and the performance impact is not as high as with older CPUs in comparison with retpoline. More information about how to enable the missing bits for those two possible mitigations on your system follow. You only need to take one of the two approaches."
|
explain "To mitigate this vulnerability, you need either IBRS + IBPB, both requiring hardware support from your CPU microcode in addition to kernel support, or a kernel compiled with retpoline and IBPB, with retpoline requiring a retpoline-aware compiler (re-run this script with -v to know if your version of gcc is retpoline-aware) and IBPB requiring hardware support from your CPU microcode. You also need a recent-enough kernel that supports RSB filling if you plan to use retpoline. For Skylake+ CPUs, the IBRS + IBPB approach is generally preferred as it guarantees complete protection, and the performance impact is not as high as with older CPUs in comparison with retpoline. More information about how to enable the missing bits for those two possible mitigations on your system follow. You only need to take one of the two approaches."
|
||||||
elif is_zen_cpu; then
|
elif is_zen_cpu; then
|
||||||
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "retpoline+IBPB is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"
|
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "retpoline+IBPB is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user