dsanchez/spectre-meltdown-checker
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker synced 2024-11-19 04:22:22 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

chore: update disclaimer and FAQ

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Stéphane Lesimple 2023-07-28 19:43:40 +02:00
parent b8f8c81d51
commit 2d932fdc8a
2 changed files with 22 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
FAQ.md
View File

@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ Software vulnerability:
Hardware vulnerability: Hardware vulnerability:
- Can be fixed? No, only mitigated (or buy new hardware!) - Can be fixed? No, only mitigated (or buy new hardware!)
- How to ~~fix~~ mitigate? In the worst case scenario, 5 "layers" need to be updated: the microcode/firmware, the host OS kernel, the hypervisor, the VM OS kernel, and possibly all the software running on the VM. - How to ~~fix~~ mitigate? In the worst case scenario, 5 "layers" need to be updated: the microcode/firmware, the host OS kernel, the hypervisor, the VM OS kernel, and possibly all the software running on the machine. Sometimes only a subset of those layers need to be updated. In yet other cases, there can be several possible mitigations for the same vulnerability, implying different layers. Yes, it can get horribly complicated.
A more detailed video explanation is available here: https://youtu.be/2gB9U1EcCss?t=85 A more detailed video explanation is available here: https://youtu.be/2gB9U1EcCss?t=425
## What do "affected", "vulnerable" and "mitigated" mean exactly? ## What do "affected", "vulnerable" and "mitigated" mean exactly?
@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ There are a few rules that govern how this tool is written.
A lot as changed since 2018. Nowadays, the industry adapted and this range of vulnerabilities is almost "business as usual", as software vulnerabilities are. However, due to their complexity, it's still not as easy as just checking a version number to ensure a vulnerability is closed. A lot as changed since 2018. Nowadays, the industry adapted and this range of vulnerabilities is almost "business as usual", as software vulnerabilities are. However, due to their complexity, it's still not as easy as just checking a version number to ensure a vulnerability is closed.
Granted, we now have a standard way under Linux to check whether our system is affected, vulnerable, mitigated against most of these vulnerabilities. By having a look at the `sysfs` hierarchy, and more precisely the `/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/` folder, one can have a pretty good insight about its system state for each of the listed vulnerabilities. Note that the output can be a little different with some vendors (e.g. Red Hat has some slightly different output than the vanilla kernel for some vulnerabilities), but it's still a gigantic leap forward, given where we were in 2018 when this script was started, and it's very good news. The kernel is the proper place to have this because the kernel knows everything about itself (the mitigations it might have), and the CPU (its model, and microcode features that are exposed). Granted, we now have a standard way under Linux to check whether our system is affected, vulnerable, mitigated against most of these vulnerabilities. By having a look at the `sysfs` hierarchy, and more precisely the `/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/` folder, one can have a pretty good insight about its system state for each of the listed vulnerabilities. Note that the output can be a little different with some vendors (e.g. Red Hat has some slightly different output than the vanilla kernel for some vulnerabilities), but it's still a gigantic leap forward, given where we were in 2018 when this script was started, and it's very good news. The kernel is the proper place to have this because the kernel knows everything about itself (the mitigations it might have), and the CPU (its model, and microcode features that are exposed). Note however that some vulnerabilities are not reported through this file hierarchy at all, such as Zenbleed.
However I see a few reasons why this script might still be useful to you, and that's why its development has not halted when the `sysfs` hierarchy came out: However I see a few reasons why this script might still be useful to you, and that's why its development has not halted when the `sysfs` hierarchy came out:
@ -109,12 +109,13 @@ This tool only supports Linux, and [some flavors of BSD](#which-bsd-oses-are-sup
## The tool says there is an updated microcode for my CPU, but I don't have it! ## The tool says there is an updated microcode for my CPU, but I don't have it!
Even if your operating system is fully up to date, the tool might still tell you that there is a more recent microcode version for your CPU. Currently, it uses (and merges) information from two sources: Even if your operating system is fully up to date, the tool might still tell you that there is a more recent microcode version for your CPU. Currently, it uses (and merges) information from three sources:
- The official [Intel microcode repository](https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files) - The official [Intel microcode repository](https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files)
- The awesome platomav's [MCExtractor database](https://github.com/platomav/MCExtractor) for non-Intel CPUs - The awesome platomav's [MCExtractor database](https://github.com/platomav/MCExtractor) for non-Intel CPUs
- The official [linux-firmware](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git) repository for AMD
Generally, for Intel CPUs it means that Intel does have a more recent version for your CPU, and for other CPUs it means that a more recent version has already been seen in the wild. However, your OS vendor might have chosen not to ship this new version (yet), maybe because it's currently being tested, or for other reasons. This tool can't tell you when or if this will be the case. You should ask your vendor about it. Technically, you can still go and upgrade your microcode yourself, and use this tool to confirm whether you did it successfully. Updating the microcode for you is out of the scope of this tool, as this would violate [rule 1b](#what-are-the-main-design-decisions-regarding-this-script). Generally, it means a more recent version of the microcode has been seen in the wild. However, your OS vendor might have chosen not to ship this new version (yet), maybe because it's currently being tested, or for other reasons. This tool can't tell you when or if this will be the case. You should ask your vendor about it. Technically, you can still go and upgrade your microcode yourself, and use this tool to confirm whether you did it successfully. Updating the microcode for you is out of the scope of this tool, as this would violate [rule 1b](#what-are-the-main-design-decisions-regarding-this-script).
## The tool says that I need a more up-to-date microcode, but I have the more recent version! ## The tool says that I need a more up-to-date microcode, but I have the more recent version!

29
spectre-meltdown-checker.sh
View File

@ -118,24 +118,27 @@ show_disclaimer()
Disclaimer: Disclaimer:
This tool does its best to determine whether your system is immune (or has proper mitigations in place) for the This tool does its best to determine whether your system is immune (or has proper mitigations in place) for the
collectively named "speculative execution" vulnerabilities. It doesn't attempt to run any kind of exploit, and can't guarantee collectively named "transient execution" (aka "speculative execution") vulnerabilities that started to appear
that your system is secure, but rather helps you verifying whether your system has the known correct mitigations in place. since early 2018 with the infamous Spectre & Meltdown.
This tool does NOT attempt to run any kind of exploit, and can't 100% guarantee that your system is secure,
but rather helps you verifying whether your system has the known correct mitigations in place.
However, some mitigations could also exist in your kernel that this script doesn't know (yet) how to detect, or it might However, some mitigations could also exist in your kernel that this script doesn't know (yet) how to detect, or it might
falsely detect mitigations that in the end don't work as expected (for example, on backported or modified kernels). falsely detect mitigations that in the end don't work as expected (for example, on backported or modified kernels).
Your system exposure also depends on your CPU. As of now, AMD and ARM processors are marked as immune to some or all of these Your system affectability to a given vulnerability depends on your CPU model and CPU microcode version, whereas the
vulnerabilities (except some specific ARM models). All Intel processors manufactured since circa 1995 are thought to be vulnerable, mitigations in place depend on your CPU (model and microcode), your kernel version, and both the runtime configuration
except some specific/old models, such as some early Atoms. Whatever processor one uses, one might seek more information of your CPU (through bits set through the MSRs) and your kernel. The script attempts to explain everything for each
from the manufacturer of that processor and/or of the device in which it runs. vulnerability, so you know where your system stands. For a given vulnerability, detailed information is sometimes
available using the \`--explain\` switch.
The nature of the discovered vulnerabilities being quite new, the landscape of vulnerable processors can be expected Please also note that for the Spectre-like vulnerabilities, all software can possibly be exploited, in which case
to change over time, which is why this script makes the assumption that all CPUs are vulnerable, except if the manufacturer this tool only verifies that the kernel (which is the core of the system) you're using has the proper protections
explicitly stated otherwise in a verifiable public announcement. in place. Verifying all the other software is out of the scope of this tool, as it can't be done in a simple way.
As a general measure, ensure you always have the most up to date stable versions of all the software you use,
especially for those who are exposed to the world, such as network daemons and browsers.
Please also note that for Spectre vulnerabilities, all software can possibly be exploited, this tool only verifies that the For more information and answers to related questions, please refer to the FAQ.md file.
kernel (which is the core of the system) you're using has the proper protections in place. Verifying all the other software
is out of the scope of this tool. As a general measure, ensure you always have the most up to date stable versions of all
the software you use, especially for those who are exposed to the world, such as network daemons and browsers.
This tool has been released in the hope that it'll be useful, but don't use it to jump to conclusions about your security. This tool has been released in the hope that it'll be useful, but don't use it to jump to conclusions about your security.