1
0
mirror of https://github.com/TREX-CoE/qmc-lttc.git synced 2024-12-21 11:53:58 +01:00

Update QMC.org

This commit is contained in:
filippi-claudia 2021-02-01 22:09:14 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent f69b5f0502
commit a095fc0eec
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -2222,7 +2222,7 @@ gfortran hydrogen.f90 qmc_stats.f90 vmc_metropolis.f90 -o vmc_metropolis
To this aim, we use the mixed estimator of the energy:
\begin{eqnarray*}
E(\tau) &=& \frac{\langle \psi(tau) | \hat{H} | \Psi_T \rangle}{\langle \psi(tau) | \Psi_T \rangle}\\
E(\tau) &=& \frac{\langle \psi(\tau) | \hat{H} | \Psi_T \rangle}{\langle \psi(\tau) | \Psi_T \rangle}\\
&=& \frac{\int \psi(\mathbf{r},\tau) \hat{H} \Psi_T(\mathbf{r}) d\mathbf{r}}
{\int \psi(\mathbf{r},\tau) \Psi_T(\mathbf{r}) d\mathbf{r}} \\
&=& \frac{\int \psi(\mathbf{r},\tau) \Psi_T(\mathbf{r}) E_L(\mathbf{r}) d\mathbf{r}}
@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ gfortran hydrogen.f90 qmc_stats.f90 vmc_metropolis.f90 -o vmc_metropolis
- You estimate the energy as
\begin{eqnarray*}
E = \frac{\sum_{k=1}{N_{\rm MC}} E_L(\mathbf{r}_k) W(\mathbf{r}_k, k\delta t)}{\sum_{k=1}{N_{\rm MC}} W(\mathbf{r}_k, k\delta t)}
E = \frac{\sum_{k=1}^{N_{\rm MC}} E_L(\mathbf{r}_k) W(\mathbf{r}_k, k\delta t)}{\sum_{k=1}^{N_{\rm MC}} W(\mathbf{r}_k, k\delta t)}
\end{eqnarray*}
- The result will be affected by a time-step error (the finite size of $\delta t$) and one
@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ gfortran hydrogen.f90 qmc_stats.f90 vmc_metropolis.f90 -o vmc_metropolis
- The accept/reject step (steps 2-5 in the algorithm) is in principle not needed for the correctness of
the DMC algorithm. However, its use reduces significantly the time-step error.
PDMC algorithm is less stable than the branching algorithm: it
The PDMC algorithm is less stable than the branching algorithm: it
requires to have a value of $E_\text{ref}$ which is close to the
fixed-node energy, and a good trial wave function. Its big
advantage is that it is very easy to program starting from a VMC