diff --git a/Manuscript/Be.pdf b/Manuscript/Be.pdf
index 4451217..6f3da8f 100644
Binary files a/Manuscript/Be.pdf and b/Manuscript/Be.pdf differ
diff --git a/Manuscript/CBD_D2h.pdf b/Manuscript/CBD_D2h.pdf
index a470ab2..6ce945d 100644
Binary files a/Manuscript/CBD_D2h.pdf and b/Manuscript/CBD_D2h.pdf differ
diff --git a/Manuscript/CBD_D4h.pdf b/Manuscript/CBD_D4h.pdf
index e12736d..4688666 100644
Binary files a/Manuscript/CBD_D4h.pdf and b/Manuscript/CBD_D4h.pdf differ
diff --git a/Manuscript/sfBSE.tex b/Manuscript/sfBSE.tex
index 4d42034..66e84c6 100644
--- a/Manuscript/sfBSE.tex
+++ b/Manuscript/sfBSE.tex
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ Finally, both SF-ADC(2)-x and SF-ADC(3) yield excitation energies very close to
 	\label{tab:Be}}
 	\begin{ruledtabular}
 		\begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
-									&	\mc{5}{c}{States}		\\
+									&	\mc{5}{c}{Excitation energies (eV)}		\\
 %									&	\mc{5}{c}{6-31G}		&	\mc{5}{c}{aug-cc-pVQZ}			\\
 										\cline{2-6}					%\cline{7-11}
 			Method					&	$^1S(1s^2 2s^2)$		&	$^3P(1s^2 2s^1 2p^1)$	&	$^1P(1s^2 2s^1 2p^1)$	
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ Finally, both SF-ADC(2)-x and SF-ADC(3) yield excitation energies very close to
 			SF-TD-BH\&HLYP\fnm[1]	&	(0.000)	&	2.874(1.981)	&	4.922(0.023)	&	7.112(1.000)	&	8.188(0.002)	\\
 			SF-CIS\fnm[2]			&	(0.002)	&	2.111(2.000)	&	6.036(0.014)	&	7.480(1.000)	&	8.945(0.006)	\\
 			SF-BSE@{\GOWO}			&	(0.004)	&	2.399(1.999)	&	6.191(0.023)	&	7.792(1.000)	&	9.373(0.013)	\\
-			SF-BSE@{\evGW}			&	(0.004)	&	2.407(1.999)	&	6.199(0.023)	&	7.788(1.000)	&	9.388(0.013)	\\
+%			SF-BSE@{\evGW}			&	(0.004)	&	2.407(1.999)	&	6.199(0.023)	&	7.788(1.000)	&	9.388(0.013)	\\
 			SF-dBSE@{\GOWO}			&			&	2.363			&	6.263			&	7.824			&	9.424			\\
 %			SF-dBSE@{\evGW}			&			&	2.369			&	6.273			&	7.820			&	9.441	\\
 			SF-ADC(2)-s				&			&	2.433			&	6.255			&	7.745			&	9.047 		\\
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ The $\text{X}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ ground state of \ce{H2} has an electronic config
 The variation of the excitation energies associated with the three lowest singlet excited states with respect to the elongation of the \ce{H-H} bond are of particular interest here. 
 The lowest singly excited state $\text{B}\,{}^1 \Sigma_u^+$ has a $(1\sigma_g )(1\sigma_u)$ configuration, while the singly excited state $\text{E}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ and the doubly excited state $\text{F}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ have $(1\sigma_g ) (2\sigma_g)$ and $(1\sigma_u )(1\sigma_u)$ configurations, respectively. 
 Because these latter two excited states interact strongly and form an avoided crossing around $R(\ce{H-H}) = 1.4$ \AA, they are usually labeled as the $\text{EF}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ state.
-Note that this avoided crossing is not visible with non-spin-flip methods, such as CIS, TD-DFT, and BSE, as these are ``blind'' to double excitations.
+Note that this avoided crossing is not visible with non-spin-flip methods restricted to single excitations (such as CIS, TD-DFT, and BSE) as these are ``blind'' to double excitations.
 Three methods, in their standard and spin-flip versions, are studied here (CIS, TD-BH\&HLYP and BSE) and are compared to the reference EOM-CCSD excitation energies (that is equivalent to FCI in the case of \ce{H2}).
 All these calculations are performed in the cc-pVQZ basis, and both the spin-conserved and spin-flip calculations are performed with an unrestricted reference.
 
@@ -846,9 +846,9 @@ This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-\section*{Data availability statement}
+%\section*{Data availability statement}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-The data that supports the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.
+%The data that supports the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 \bibliography{sfBSE}