one more ref
This commit is contained in:
parent
de86ab0cd6
commit
10d7e68234
@ -1,13 +1,26 @@
|
|||||||
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
||||||
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
|
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2021-01-19 16:50:28 +0100
|
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2021-01-19 17:10:17 +0100
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{Li_2021,
|
||||||
|
author = {Li, Jing and Olevano, Valerio},
|
||||||
|
date-added = {2021-01-19 17:08:27 +0100},
|
||||||
|
date-modified = {2021-01-19 17:10:13 +0100},
|
||||||
|
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.103.012809},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. A},
|
||||||
|
pages = {012809},
|
||||||
|
title = {Hydrogen-molecule spectrum by the many-body $GW$ approximation and the Bethe-Salpeter equation},
|
||||||
|
volume = {103},
|
||||||
|
year = {2021},
|
||||||
|
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.012809},
|
||||||
|
Bdsk-Url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.012809}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Vitale_2020,
|
@article{Vitale_2020,
|
||||||
author = {Vitale, Eugenio and Alavi, Ali and Kats, Daniel},
|
author = {Vitale, Eugenio and Alavi, Ali and Kats, Daniel},
|
||||||
date-added = {2021-01-17 22:10:20 +0100},
|
date-added = {2021-01-17 22:10:20 +0100},
|
||||||
|
@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ Finally, both SF-ADC(2)-x and SF-ADC(3) yield excitation energies very close to
|
|||||||
\label{sec:H2}
|
\label{sec:H2}
|
||||||
%===============================
|
%===============================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Our second example deals with the dissociation of the \ce{H2} molecule, which is a prototypical system for testing new electronic structure methods and, specifically, their accuracy in the presence of strong correlation (see, for example, Refs.~\onlinecite{Caruso_2013,Barca_2014,Vuckovic_2017}, and references therein).
|
Our second example deals with the dissociation of the \ce{H2} molecule, which is a prototypical system for testing new electronic structure methods and, specifically, their accuracy in the presence of strong correlation (see, for example, Refs.~\onlinecite{Caruso_2013,Barca_2014,Vuckovic_2017,Li_2021}, and references therein).
|
||||||
The $\text{X}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ ground state of \ce{H2} has an electronic configuration $(1\sigma_g)^2$ configuration.
|
The $\text{X}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ ground state of \ce{H2} has an electronic configuration $(1\sigma_g)^2$ configuration.
|
||||||
The variation of the excitation energies associated with the three lowest singlet excited states with respect to the elongation of the \ce{H-H} bond are of particular interest here.
|
The variation of the excitation energies associated with the three lowest singlet excited states with respect to the elongation of the \ce{H-H} bond are of particular interest here.
|
||||||
The lowest singly excited state $\text{B}\,{}^1 \Sigma_u^+$ has a $(1\sigma_g )(1\sigma_u)$ configuration, while the singly excited state $\text{E}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ and the doubly excited state $\text{F}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ have $(1\sigma_g ) (2\sigma_g)$ and $(1\sigma_u )(1\sigma_u)$ configurations, respectively.
|
The lowest singly excited state $\text{B}\,{}^1 \Sigma_u^+$ has a $(1\sigma_g )(1\sigma_u)$ configuration, while the singly excited state $\text{E}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ and the doubly excited state $\text{F}\,{}^1 \Sigma_g^+$ have $(1\sigma_g ) (2\sigma_g)$ and $(1\sigma_u )(1\sigma_u)$ configurations, respectively.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user