figs and abstract
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb7edbd858
commit
c3d59e1b5a
29
benzene.tex
29
benzene.tex
@ -36,6 +36,12 @@
|
|||||||
\email{scemama@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
\email{scemama@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
||||||
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Abstract
|
||||||
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||||||
|
Following the recent work of Eriksen \textit{et al.} [\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02678}{arXiv:2008.02678 [physics.chem-ph]}], we report the performance of the \textit{Configuration Interaction using a Perturbative Selection made Iteratively} (CIPSI) method on the non-relativistic frozen-core correlation energy of the ground state of the benzene molecule in the cc-pVDZ basis. Following our usual protocol, we obtain a correlation energy of $-8xx.xx$ m$E_h$ which agrees with the best theoretical estimate of $-863$ m$E_h$ proposed by Eriksen \textit{et al.} using an extensive array of highly-accurate new electronic structure methods.
|
||||||
|
\end{abstract}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Title
|
||||||
\maketitle
|
\maketitle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Intro
|
% Intro
|
||||||
@ -57,7 +63,7 @@ We refer the interested reader to Ref.~\onlinecite{Eriksen_2020} and its support
|
|||||||
Soon after, Lee \textit{et al.} reported phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo \cite{Motta_2018} (ph-AFQMC) correlation energies for the very same problem. \cite{Lee_2020}
|
Soon after, Lee \textit{et al.} reported phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo \cite{Motta_2018} (ph-AFQMC) correlation energies for the very same problem. \cite{Lee_2020}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% The system
|
% The system
|
||||||
The target application is the non-relativistic frozen-core correlation energy of the benzene molecule in the cc-pVDZ basis.
|
The target application is the non-relativistic frozen-core correlation energy of the ground state of the benzene molecule in the cc-pVDZ basis.
|
||||||
The geometry of benzene has been computed at the MP2/6-31G* level and it can be found in the supporting information of Ref.~\onlinecite{Eriksen_2020}.
|
The geometry of benzene has been computed at the MP2/6-31G* level and it can be found in the supporting information of Ref.~\onlinecite{Eriksen_2020}.
|
||||||
This corresponds to an active space of 30 electrons and 108 orbitals, \ie, the Hilbert space of benzene is of the order of $10^{35}$ Slater determinants.
|
This corresponds to an active space of 30 electrons and 108 orbitals, \ie, the Hilbert space of benzene is of the order of $10^{35}$ Slater determinants.
|
||||||
Needless to say that this size of Hilbert space cannot be tackled by exact diagonalization with current architectures.
|
Needless to say that this size of Hilbert space cannot be tackled by exact diagonalization with current architectures.
|
||||||
@ -100,7 +106,7 @@ However, performing SCI calculations rapidly becomes extremely tedious when one
|
|||||||
From an historical point of view, CIPSI is probably one of the oldest SCI algorithm.
|
From an historical point of view, CIPSI is probably one of the oldest SCI algorithm.
|
||||||
It was developed in 1973 by Huron, Rancurel, and Malrieu \cite{Huron_1973} (see also Ref.~\onlinecite{Evangelisti_1983}).
|
It was developed in 1973 by Huron, Rancurel, and Malrieu \cite{Huron_1973} (see also Ref.~\onlinecite{Evangelisti_1983}).
|
||||||
Recently, the determinant-driven CIPSI algorithm has been efficiently implemented \cite{Giner_2013,Giner_2015} in the open-source programming environment {\QP} by one of us (AS) enabling to perform massively parallel computations. \cite{Garniron_2017,Garniron_2018,Garniron_2019}
|
Recently, the determinant-driven CIPSI algorithm has been efficiently implemented \cite{Giner_2013,Giner_2015} in the open-source programming environment {\QP} by one of us (AS) enabling to perform massively parallel computations. \cite{Garniron_2017,Garniron_2018,Garniron_2019}
|
||||||
In particular, we were able to compute highly-accurate calculations of ground- and excited-state energies of small- and medium-sized molecules. \cite{Loos_2018a,Loos_2019,Loos_2020a,Loos_2020b,Loos_2020c}
|
In particular, we were able to compute highly-accurate calculations of ground- and excited-state energies of small- and medium-sized molecules (including benzene). \cite{Loos_2018a,Loos_2019,Loos_2020a,Loos_2020b,Loos_2020c}
|
||||||
CIPSI is also frequently use to provide accurate trial wave function for QMC calculations. \cite{Caffarel_2014,Caffarel_2016a,Caffarel_2016b,Giner_2013,Giner_2015,Scemama_2015,Scemama_2016,Scemama_2018,Scemama_2018b,Scemama_2019,Dash_2018,Dash_2019}
|
CIPSI is also frequently use to provide accurate trial wave function for QMC calculations. \cite{Caffarel_2014,Caffarel_2016a,Caffarel_2016b,Giner_2013,Giner_2015,Scemama_2015,Scemama_2016,Scemama_2018,Scemama_2018b,Scemama_2019,Dash_2018,Dash_2019}
|
||||||
The particularity of the current implementation is that the selection step and the PT2 correction are computed \textit{simultaneously} via a hybrid semistochastic algorithm. \cite{Garniron_2017,Garniron_2019}
|
The particularity of the current implementation is that the selection step and the PT2 correction are computed \textit{simultaneously} via a hybrid semistochastic algorithm. \cite{Garniron_2017,Garniron_2019}
|
||||||
Moreover, a renormalized version of the PT2 correction (dubbed rPT2 in the following) has been recently implemented for a more efficient extrapolation to the FCI limit (see below). \cite{Garniron_2019}
|
Moreover, a renormalized version of the PT2 correction (dubbed rPT2 in the following) has been recently implemented for a more efficient extrapolation to the FCI limit (see below). \cite{Garniron_2019}
|
||||||
@ -124,7 +130,9 @@ We believe that it provides a very safe estimate of the extrapolation error.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The three flavours of SCI fall into an interval ranging from $-863.7$ to $-862.8$ m$E_h$.
|
The three flavours of SCI fall into an interval ranging from $-863.7$ to $-862.8$ m$E_h$.
|
||||||
The CIPSI number is ?
|
The CIPSI number is ?
|
||||||
|
\titou{Note that, even though benzene is big, we have already reported excitation energies of benzene with the 6-31+G(d) basis in Ref.~\onlinecite{Loos_2019}.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%% TABLE II %%%
|
||||||
\begin{table}
|
\begin{table}
|
||||||
\caption{Extrapolation distances, $\Delta E_{\text{dist}}$ (in m$E_{\text{H}}$), involved in computing the final ASCI, iCI, SHCI, CIPSI, and DMRG results.
|
\caption{Extrapolation distances, $\Delta E_{\text{dist}}$ (in m$E_{\text{H}}$), involved in computing the final ASCI, iCI, SHCI, CIPSI, and DMRG results.
|
||||||
These are defined by the difference between the final computed energy, $\Delta E_{\text{final}}$, and the extrapolated energy, $\Delta E_{\text{extrap.}}$ (final variational energies, that is, in the absence of perturbation theory, are presented as $\Delta E_{\text{var.}}$). For the SCI methods, extrapolations are performed toward the limit of vanishing perturbative correction, while the variational DMRG energy is extrapolated toward an infinite bond dimension.
|
These are defined by the difference between the final computed energy, $\Delta E_{\text{final}}$, and the extrapolated energy, $\Delta E_{\text{extrap.}}$ (final variational energies, that is, in the absence of perturbation theory, are presented as $\Delta E_{\text{var.}}$). For the SCI methods, extrapolations are performed toward the limit of vanishing perturbative correction, while the variational DMRG energy is extrapolated toward an infinite bond dimension.
|
||||||
@ -143,8 +151,23 @@ The CIPSI number is ?
|
|||||||
\end{ruledtabular}
|
\end{ruledtabular}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%$ FIG. 1 %%%
|
||||||
|
\begin{figure*}
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{fig1a}
|
||||||
|
\hspace{0.08\linewidth}
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{fig1b}
|
||||||
|
\caption{
|
||||||
|
Convergence of the CIPSI correlation energy for benzene.
|
||||||
|
Left: $\Delta E_\text{var.}$, $\Delta E_\text{var.} + E_\text{PT2}$, and $\Delta E_\text{var.} + E_\text{rPT2}$ (in m$E_h$) as functions of the number of determinants in the variational space.
|
||||||
|
Right: $\Delta E_\text{var.} + E_\text{PT2}$ and $\Delta E_\text{var.} + E_\text{rPT2}$ (in m$E_h$) as functions of $E_\text{PT2}$ or $E_\text{rPT2}$.
|
||||||
|
The two-point linear extrapolation curves (dashed lines) are also reported.
|
||||||
|
The theoretical best estimate of $-863$ m$E_h$ from Ref.~\onlinecite{Eriksen_2020} is reported for comparison purposes.
|
||||||
|
\label{fig:CIPSI}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Acknowledgements
|
% Acknowledgements
|
||||||
This work was performed using HPC resources from GENCI-TGCC (Grand Challenge 2019-gch0418) and from CALMIP (Toulouse) under allocation 2019-0510.
|
This work was performed using HPC resources from GENCI-TGCC (Grand Challenge 2019-gch0418) and from CALMIP (Toulouse) under allocation 2020-18005.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\bibliography{benzene}
|
\bibliography{benzene}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user