10
0
mirror of https://github.com/QuantumPackage/qp2.git synced 2024-12-23 04:43:45 +01:00
This commit is contained in:
Kevin Gasperich 2020-02-25 10:27:08 -06:00
parent 7e3e2b9db9
commit 5418ed0f1c

View File

@ -1,6 +1,28 @@
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
current:
h_apply.irp.f
push/pull_pt2
pt2,norm_pert,h_pert_diag
types?
if complex, do we need to keep imag part? (should imag sum to zero?)
h_apply_{,{,no}zmq}.template.f
see generate_h_apply.py script
may need to modify
selectors
(looks like nothing in e_corr_selectors.irp.f is used elsewhere?)
(only e_corr_per_sel outside of src (provided in h apply gen script))
coef_hf_selector (inv, invsquared)
for real, is sign important, or just magnitude?
e_corr_per_selectors (is this used anywhere?)
provided in generate_h_apply.py?
<Di|H|HF> * c(Di) / c(HF)
complex, but does this matter?
is magnitude important or just real part?
i_H_HF_per_selectors
<Di|H|HF>
not used anywhere else, so no additional concerns other than for e_corr_per_selectors
delta_E_per_selector
general:
check for dependence on psi_det_sorted, clean up providers
@ -30,10 +52,8 @@ determinants:
(****) h_apply_nozmq.template.f
(****) h_apply.template.f
(****) h_apply_zmq.template.f
(****) occ_pattern.irp.f
mostly done?
might need to change calls to fill_h_apply_buffer_no_selection?
check again after modifying h_apply for complex
(done) occ_pattern.irp.f
(might need to change if we change h_apply)
(done) prune_wf.irp.f
(done) psi_cas{,_complex}.irp.f
might be able to combine some providers??