Done with IIC
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c0595b412
commit
d964d2cd01
@ -388,8 +388,8 @@ setting $\lambda = 1$ then yields approximate solutions to Eq.~\eqref{eq:SchrEq}
|
|||||||
Mathematically, Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_expansion} corresponds to a Taylor series expansion of the exact energy
|
Mathematically, Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_expansion} corresponds to a Taylor series expansion of the exact energy
|
||||||
around the reference system $\lambda = 0$.
|
around the reference system $\lambda = 0$.
|
||||||
The energy of the target ``physical'' system is recovered at the point $\lambda = 1$.
|
The energy of the target ``physical'' system is recovered at the point $\lambda = 1$.
|
||||||
However, like all series expansions, the Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_expansion} has a radius of convergence $\rc$.
|
However, like all series expansions, Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_expansion} has a radius of convergence $\rc$.
|
||||||
When $\rc \le 1$, the Rayleigh--Sch\"{r}odinger expansion will diverge
|
When $\rc < 1$, the Rayleigh--Schr\"{o}dinger expansion will diverge
|
||||||
for the physical system.
|
for the physical system.
|
||||||
The value of $\rc$ can vary significantly between different systems and strongly depends on the particular decomposition
|
The value of $\rc$ can vary significantly between different systems and strongly depends on the particular decomposition
|
||||||
of the reference and perturbation Hamiltonians in Eq.~\eqref{eq:SchrEq-PT}.\cite{Mihalka_2017b}
|
of the reference and perturbation Hamiltonians in Eq.~\eqref{eq:SchrEq-PT}.\cite{Mihalka_2017b}
|
||||||
@ -418,9 +418,9 @@ This divergence occurs because $f(x)$ has four singularities in the complex
|
|||||||
($\e^{\i\pi/4}$, $\e^{-\i\pi/4}$, $\e^{\i3\pi/4}$, and $\e^{-\i3\pi/4}$) with a modulus equal to $1$, demonstrating
|
($\e^{\i\pi/4}$, $\e^{-\i\pi/4}$, $\e^{\i3\pi/4}$, and $\e^{-\i3\pi/4}$) with a modulus equal to $1$, demonstrating
|
||||||
that complex singularities are essential to fully understand the series convergence on the real axis.\cite{BenderBook}
|
that complex singularities are essential to fully understand the series convergence on the real axis.\cite{BenderBook}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The radius of convergence for the perturbation series Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_expansion} is therefore dictated by the magnitude $\abs{\lambda_c}$ of the
|
The radius of convergence for the perturbation series Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_expansion} is therefore dictated by the magnitude $r_c = \abs{\lambda_c}$ of the
|
||||||
singularity in $E(\lambda)$ that is closest to the origin.
|
singularity in $E(\lambda)$ that is closest to the origin.
|
||||||
Note that when $\lambda = \lambda_c$, one cannot \textit{a priori} predict if the series is convergent or not.
|
Note that when $\abs{\lambda} = r_c$, one cannot \textit{a priori} predict if the series is convergent or not.
|
||||||
For example, the series $\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda^k/k$ diverges at $\lambda = 1$ but converges at $\lambda = -1$.
|
For example, the series $\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda^k/k$ diverges at $\lambda = 1$ but converges at $\lambda = -1$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Like the exact system in Sec.~\ref{sec:example}, the perturbation energy $E(\lambda)$ represents
|
Like the exact system in Sec.~\ref{sec:example}, the perturbation energy $E(\lambda)$ represents
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user