Done with IIIB
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e1f3956bd
commit
d088259276
@ -644,7 +644,6 @@ role of \textit{quasi}-EPs in determining the behaviour of the HF approximation.
|
|||||||
\label{sec:MP}
|
\label{sec:MP}
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%=====================================================%
|
%=====================================================%
|
||||||
\subsection{Background Theory}
|
\subsection{Background Theory}
|
||||||
%=====================================================%
|
%=====================================================%
|
||||||
@ -734,10 +733,9 @@ diatomics, where low-order RMP and UMP expansions give qualitatively wrong bindi
|
|||||||
% SLOW UMP CONVERGENCE AND SPIN CONTAMINATION
|
% SLOW UMP CONVERGENCE AND SPIN CONTAMINATION
|
||||||
The divergence of RMP expansions for stretched bonds can be easily understood from two perspectives.\cite{Gill_1988a}
|
The divergence of RMP expansions for stretched bonds can be easily understood from two perspectives.\cite{Gill_1988a}
|
||||||
Firstly, the exact wave function becomes increasingly multi-configurational as the bond is stretched, and the
|
Firstly, the exact wave function becomes increasingly multi-configurational as the bond is stretched, and the
|
||||||
HF wave function no longer provides a qualitatively correct reference for the perturbation expansion.
|
\titou{R}HF wave function no longer provides a qualitatively correct reference for the perturbation expansion.
|
||||||
Secondly, the energy gap between the bonding and anitbonding orbitals associated with the stretch becomes
|
Secondly, the energy gap between the bonding and antibonding orbitals associated with the stretch becomes
|
||||||
increasingly small at larger bond lengths, leading to a divergence in the Rayleigh--Schr\"odinger perturbation
|
increasingly small at larger bond lengths, \titou{leading to a divergence, for example, in the second-order MP correction \eqref{eq:EMP2}.}
|
||||||
expansion Eq.~\eqref{eq:EMP2}.
|
|
||||||
In contrast, the origin of slow UMP convergence is less obvious as the reference UHF energy remains
|
In contrast, the origin of slow UMP convergence is less obvious as the reference UHF energy remains
|
||||||
qualitatively correct at large bond lengths and the orbital degeneracy is avoided.
|
qualitatively correct at large bond lengths and the orbital degeneracy is avoided.
|
||||||
Furthermore, this slow convergence can also be observed in molecules with a UHF ground state at the equilibrium
|
Furthermore, this slow convergence can also be observed in molecules with a UHF ground state at the equilibrium
|
||||||
@ -748,14 +746,14 @@ Using the UHF framework allows the singlet ground state wave function to mix wit
|
|||||||
leading to spin contamination where the wave function is no longer an eigenfunction of the $\Hat{\cS}^2$ operator.
|
leading to spin contamination where the wave function is no longer an eigenfunction of the $\Hat{\cS}^2$ operator.
|
||||||
The link between slow UMP convergence and this spin-contamination was first systematically investigated
|
The link between slow UMP convergence and this spin-contamination was first systematically investigated
|
||||||
by Gill \etal\ using the minimal basis \ce{H2} model.\cite{Gill_1988}
|
by Gill \etal\ using the minimal basis \ce{H2} model.\cite{Gill_1988}
|
||||||
In this work, the authors compared the UMP series with the exact RHF- and UHF-based FCI expansions
|
In this work, the authors compared \titou{the UMP series with the exact RHF- and UHF-based FCI expansions (T2: I don't understand this)}
|
||||||
and identified that the slow UMP convergence arises from its failure to correctly predict the amplitude of the
|
and identified that the slow UMP convergence arises from its failure to correctly predict the amplitude of the
|
||||||
low-lying double excitation.
|
low-lying double excitation.
|
||||||
This erroneous description of the double excitation amplitude has the same origin as the spin-contamination in the reference
|
This erroneous description of the double excitation amplitude has the same origin as the spin-contamination in the reference
|
||||||
UHF wave function, creating the first direct link between spin-contamination and slow UMP convergence.\cite{Gill_1988}
|
UHF wave function, creating the first direct link between spin-contamination and slow UMP convergence.\cite{Gill_1988}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% LEPETIT CHAT
|
% LEPETIT CHAT
|
||||||
Lepetit \etal\ later analysed the difference between perturbation convergence using the unrestricted MP
|
Lepetit \etal\ later analysed the difference between perturbation convergence using the UMP
|
||||||
and EN partitionings. \cite{Lepetit_1988}
|
and EN partitionings. \cite{Lepetit_1988}
|
||||||
They argued that the slow UMP convergence for stretched molecules arises from
|
They argued that the slow UMP convergence for stretched molecules arises from
|
||||||
(i) the fact that the MP denominator (see Eq.~\ref{eq:EMP2})
|
(i) the fact that the MP denominator (see Eq.~\ref{eq:EMP2})
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user