Added discussion on self-consistency as a perturbation
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6333bb3d7
commit
cbc6f666a6
@ -520,19 +520,12 @@ Note that the RHF wave function remains a genuine solution of the HF equations f
|
||||
of the HF energy rather than a minimum.
|
||||
|
||||
%============================================================%
|
||||
\subsection{Complex adiabatic connection}
|
||||
\subsection{Self-consistency as a perturbation} %OR {Complex adiabatic connection}
|
||||
%============================================================%
|
||||
Self-consistency in HF approximations leads to the inherently non-linear Fock eigenvalue
|
||||
problem that is normally solved using an iterative approach.
|
||||
Alternatively, the non-linear terms arising from the Coulomb and exchange can be considered
|
||||
as a perturbation from the reference core Hamiltonian problem by introducing the parameterised Fock operator
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\Hat{f}_{\lambda}(\vb{x}) = \Hat{h}(\vb{x}) + \lambda\, \Hat{v}_\text{HF}(\vb{x}).
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
The orbitals in the reference problem correspond to the symmetry-pure eigenfunctions of the one-electron core
|
||||
Hamiltonian, while self-consistent solutions at $\lambda = 1$ represent the orbitals of the exact HF solution.
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 1 %%%
|
||||
%%% FIG 3 (?) %%%
|
||||
% Analytic Continuation of HF
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[t]
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.65\textwidth,trim={0pt 0pt 0pt -30pt},clip]{HF_cplx_angle}
|
||||
@ -546,7 +539,43 @@ Hamiltonian, while self-consistent solutions at $\lambda = 1$ represent the orbi
|
||||
Analytic continuation of HF into the complex $\lambda$ plane.
|
||||
\label{fig:HF_cplx}}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
|
||||
% INTRODUCE PARAMETRISED FOCK HAMILTONIAN
|
||||
\hugh{The inherent non-linearity in the Fock eigenvalue problem arises from self-consistency
|
||||
in the HF approximation, and is usually solved through an iterative approach.\cite{SzaboBook}
|
||||
Alternatively, the non-linear terms arising from the Coulomb and exchange operators can
|
||||
be considered as a perturbation from the core Hamiltonian by introducing the
|
||||
transformation $U \rightarrow \lambda\, U$, giving the parametrised Fock operator
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\Hat{f}_{\lambda}(\vb{x}) = \Hat{h}(\vb{x}) + \lambda\, \Hat{v}_\text{HF}(\vb{x}).
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
The orbitals in the reference problem $\lambda=0$ correspond to the symmetry-pure eigenfunctions of the one-electron core
|
||||
Hamiltonian, while self-consistent solutions at $\lambda = 1$ represent the orbitals of the true HF solution.}
|
||||
|
||||
% INTRODUCE COMPLEX ANALYTIC-CONTINUATION
|
||||
\hugh{For real $\lambda$, the self-consistent HF energies at give (real) $U$ and $t$ values
|
||||
in the Hubbard dimer directly mirror the energies shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_real},
|
||||
with coalesence points at
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\lambda_{\text{c}} = \pm \frac{2t}{U}.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
In contrast, when $\lambda$ becomes complex, the HF equations become non-Hermitian and
|
||||
each HF solutions can be analytically continued for all $\lambda$ values using
|
||||
the holomorphic HF approach.\cite{Hiscock_2014,Burton_2016,Burton_2018}
|
||||
Remarkably, the coalescence point in this analytic continuation emerges as a
|
||||
\textit{quasi}-EP on the real $\lambda$ axis (Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_cplx}), where
|
||||
the different HF solutions become equivalent but not self-orthogonal.\cite{Burton_2019}
|
||||
By analogy with perturbation theory, the regime where this quasi-EP occurs
|
||||
within $\lambda_{\text{c}} \le 1$ can be interpreted as an indication that
|
||||
the symmetry-pure reference orbitals no longer provide a qualitatively
|
||||
accurate representation for the true HF ground state at $\lambda = 1$.
|
||||
For example, in the Hubbard dimer with $U > 2t$, one finds $\lambda_{\text{c}} < 1$ and the symmetry-pure orbitals
|
||||
do not provide a good representation of the HF ground state.
|
||||
In contrast, $U < 2t$ yields $\lambda_{\text{c}} > 1$ and corresponds to
|
||||
the regime where the HF ground state is correctly represented by symmetry-pure orbitals.}
|
||||
|
||||
% COMPLEX ADIABATIC CONNECTION
|
||||
\titou{In a recent paper, \cite{Burton_2019} using holomorphic Hartree-Fock (h-HF) \cite{Hiscock_2014,Burton_2018,Burton_2016} as an analytic continuation of conventional HF theory, we have demonstrated, on a simple model, that one can interconvert states of different symmetries and natures by following well-defined contours in the complex $\lambda$-plane, where $\lambda$ is the strength of the electron-electron interaction (see Fig.~\ref{fig:iAC}).
|
||||
In particular, by slowly varying $\lambda$ in a similar (yet different) manner to an adiabatic connection in density-functional theory, \cite{Langreth_1975,Gunnarsson_1976,Zhang_2004} one can ``morph'' a ground-state wave function into an excited-state wave function via a stationary path of HF solutions. \cite{Seidl_2018}
|
||||
In such a way, we could obtain a doubly-excited state wave function starting from the ground state wave function, a process which is not as easy as one might think. \cite{Gilbert_2008,Thom_2008,Shea_2018}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user