update monday

This commit is contained in:
Antoine Marie 2020-07-20 18:01:41 +02:00
parent d9264ce394
commit 5f6d8f79b1
4 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions

BIN
RapportStage/CSF_RCV.pdf Normal file

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ We will take the simple case of the M{\o}ller-Plesset partitioning with a restri
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{EMP_RHF_R10.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{RHFMiniBasRCV.pdf}
\caption{\centering }
\label{fig:RHFMiniBasRCV}
@ -563,13 +564,20 @@ Then we will compare the different partitioning using the same basis set. The \a
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{PartitioningRCV.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{PartitioningRCV.pdf}
\caption{\centering }
\label{fig:RadiusPartitioning}
\end{figure}
Puis différence entre $Y_{l0}$ et $P_l(\cos(\theta))$ (CSF). + petit Parler de la possibilité de la base strong coupling avec la citation paola et les polynomes . \\
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{CSF_RCV.pdf}
\caption{\centering }
\label{fig:RadiusCSF}
\end{figure}
Différence RHF/UHF, Hamiltonien non-bloc diagonal, coefficients complexe pour R<3/2 \\
Influence de la taille de la base en RHF et UHF \\
@ -584,13 +592,6 @@ UHF: CF point = QPT, ESQPT ???
PT broken symmetry sb UHF
\section{To do list}
\begin{itemize}
\item Corriger les erreurs dans la biblio
\item citation spin density wave et charge density wave
\end{itemize}
\section{Conclusion}
\newpage