OK with III
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f0b1759d2
commit
5153f6fdac
@ -1266,7 +1266,7 @@ Large $U$ can be physically interpreted as strong electron repulsion effects in
|
|||||||
In contrast, smaller $\epsilon$ gives a weaker attraction to the atomic site,
|
In contrast, smaller $\epsilon$ gives a weaker attraction to the atomic site,
|
||||||
representing strong screening of the nuclear attraction by core and valence electrons,
|
representing strong screening of the nuclear attraction by core and valence electrons,
|
||||||
and again a less negative $\lambda$ is required for ionisation to occur.
|
and again a less negative $\lambda$ is required for ionisation to occur.
|
||||||
Both of these factors are common in atoms on the right-hand side of the periodic table, \eg\ \ce{F},
|
Both of these factors are common in atoms on the right-hand side of the periodic table, \eg, \ce{F},
|
||||||
\ce{O}, \ce{Ne}.
|
\ce{O}, \ce{Ne}.
|
||||||
Molecules containing these atoms are therefore often class $\beta$ systems with
|
Molecules containing these atoms are therefore often class $\beta$ systems with
|
||||||
a divergent RMP series due to the MP critical point. \cite{Goodson_2004,Sergeev_2006}
|
a divergent RMP series due to the MP critical point. \cite{Goodson_2004,Sergeev_2006}
|
||||||
@ -1324,9 +1324,9 @@ connection to MP critical points and QPTs (see Sec.~\ref{sec:MP_critical_point})
|
|||||||
For $\lambda>1$, the HF potential becomes an attractive component in Stillinger's
|
For $\lambda>1$, the HF potential becomes an attractive component in Stillinger's
|
||||||
Hamiltonian displayed in Eq.~\eqref{eq:HamiltonianStillinger}, while the explicit electron-electron interaction
|
Hamiltonian displayed in Eq.~\eqref{eq:HamiltonianStillinger}, while the explicit electron-electron interaction
|
||||||
becomes increasingly repulsive.
|
becomes increasingly repulsive.
|
||||||
Closed--shell critical points along the positive real $\lambda$ axis then represent
|
Closed-shell critical points along the positive real $\lambda$ axis then represent
|
||||||
points where the two-electron repulsion overcomes the attractive HF potential
|
points where the two-electron repulsion overcomes the attractive HF potential
|
||||||
and a single electron dissociates from the molecule (see Ref.~\onlinecite{Sergeev_2006})
|
and a single electron dissociates from the molecule (see Ref.~\onlinecite{Sergeev_2006}).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In contrast, symmetry-breaking in the UMP reference creates different HF potentials for the spin-up and spin-down electrons.
|
In contrast, symmetry-breaking in the UMP reference creates different HF potentials for the spin-up and spin-down electrons.
|
||||||
Consider one of the two reference UHF solutions where the spin-up and spin-down electrons are localised on the left and right sites respectively.
|
Consider one of the two reference UHF solutions where the spin-up and spin-down electrons are localised on the left and right sites respectively.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user