removing conflicts
This commit is contained in:
commit
4c78b6418a
@ -1286,11 +1286,11 @@ orbitals [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:RHF_orbs}] with $\theta_{\alpha}^{\text{RHF}} = \the
|
|||||||
%\begin{equation}
|
%\begin{equation}
|
||||||
% E_\text{HF}(0, 0) = \frac{1}{2} (2 U - 4 \epsilon).
|
% E_\text{HF}(0, 0) = \frac{1}{2} (2 U - 4 \epsilon).
|
||||||
%\end{equation}
|
%\end{equation}
|
||||||
With this representation, the parametrised RMP Hamiltonian becomes
|
With this representation, the parametrised \hugh{atomic} RMP Hamiltonian becomes
|
||||||
\begin{widetext}
|
\begin{widetext}
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\label{eq:H_RMP}
|
\label{eq:H_RMP}
|
||||||
\Tilde{\bH}_\text{RMP}\qty(\lambda) =
|
\hugh{\bH_\text{atom}\qty(\lambda)} =
|
||||||
\begin{pmatrix}
|
\begin{pmatrix}
|
||||||
2(U-\epsilon) - \lambda U & -\lambda t & -\lambda t & 0 \\
|
2(U-\epsilon) - \lambda U & -\lambda t & -\lambda t & 0 \\
|
||||||
-\lambda t & (U-\epsilon) - \lambda U & 0 & -\lambda t \\
|
-\lambda t & (U-\epsilon) - \lambda U & 0 & -\lambda t \\
|
||||||
@ -1327,7 +1327,8 @@ In contrast, smaller $\epsilon$ gives a weaker attraction to the atomic site,
|
|||||||
representing strong screening of the nuclear attraction by core and valence electrons,
|
representing strong screening of the nuclear attraction by core and valence electrons,
|
||||||
and again a less negative $\lambda$ is required for ionisation to occur.
|
and again a less negative $\lambda$ is required for ionisation to occur.
|
||||||
Both of these factors are common in atoms on the right-hand side of the periodic table, \eg\ \ce{F},
|
Both of these factors are common in atoms on the right-hand side of the periodic table, \eg\ \ce{F},
|
||||||
\ce{O}, \ce{Ne}, and thus molecules containing these atoms are often class $\beta$ systems with
|
\ce{O}, \ce{Ne}.
|
||||||
|
Molecules containing these atoms are therefore often class $\beta$ systems with
|
||||||
a divergent RMP series due to the MP critical point. \cite{Goodson_2004,Sergeev_2006}
|
a divergent RMP series due to the MP critical point. \cite{Goodson_2004,Sergeev_2006}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% EXACT VERSUS APPROXIMATE
|
% EXACT VERSUS APPROXIMATE
|
||||||
@ -1375,13 +1376,12 @@ For $\lambda>1$, the HF potential becomes an attractive component in Stillinger'
|
|||||||
Hamiltonian displayed in Eq.~\eqref{eq:HamiltonianStillinger}, while the explicit electron-electron interaction
|
Hamiltonian displayed in Eq.~\eqref{eq:HamiltonianStillinger}, while the explicit electron-electron interaction
|
||||||
becomes increasingly repulsive.
|
becomes increasingly repulsive.
|
||||||
\titou{Critical points along the positive real $\lambda$ axis for closed-shell molecules then represent
|
\titou{Critical points along the positive real $\lambda$ axis for closed-shell molecules then represent
|
||||||
points where the two-electron repulsion overcomes the attractive HF potential and an electron
|
points where the two-electron repulsion overcomes the attractive HF potential
|
||||||
are successively expelled from the molecule.\cite{Sergeev_2006}}
|
and a single electron dissociates from the molecule.\cite{Sergeev_2006}}
|
||||||
\titou{T2: I'd like to discuss that with you.}
|
\titou{T2: I'd like to discuss that with you.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Symmetry-breaking in the UMP reference creates different HF potentials for the spin-up and spin-down electrons.
|
In contrast, symmetry-breaking in the UMP reference creates different HF potentials for the spin-up and spin-down electrons.
|
||||||
Consider one of the two reference UHF solutions where the spin-up and spin-down electrons are localised on the left and
|
Consider one of the two reference UHF solutions where the spin-up and spin-down electrons are localised on the left and right sites respectively.
|
||||||
right sites respectively.
|
|
||||||
The spin-up HF potential will then be a repulsive interaction from the spin-down electron
|
The spin-up HF potential will then be a repulsive interaction from the spin-down electron
|
||||||
density that is centred around the right site (and vice-versa).
|
density that is centred around the right site (and vice-versa).
|
||||||
As $\lambda$ becomes greater than 1 and the HF potentials become attractive, there will be a sudden
|
As $\lambda$ becomes greater than 1 and the HF potentials become attractive, there will be a sudden
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user