From 223cdbfced8caff431e4e504729ef13604b6dd4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre-Francois Loos Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:20:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sec 1.2 --- RapportStage/Rapport.tex | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/RapportStage/Rapport.tex b/RapportStage/Rapport.tex index e0ee5e9..f350505 100644 --- a/RapportStage/Rapport.tex +++ b/RapportStage/Rapport.tex @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques 31062 Toulouse - France} -\url{https://www.irsamc.ups-tlse.fr/} +\url{https://www.irsamc.ups-tlse.fr/loos} } %fin de la commande \parbox encadrant / laboratoire d'accueil \vspace{0.5cm} @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ In the real $\lambda$ axis, the point for which the states are the closest ($\la The ``shape'' of the avoided crossing is linked to the magnitude of $\Im(\lambda_\text{EP})$: the smaller $\Im(\lambda_\text{EP})$, the sharper the avoided crossing is. Around $\lambda = \lambda_\text{EP}$, Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_2x2} behaves as \cite{MoiseyevBook} -\begin{equation} +\begin{equation} \label{eq:E_EP} E_{\pm} = E_\text{EP} \pm \sqrt{2\lambda_\text{EP}} \sqrt{\lambda - \lambda_\text{EP}}, \end{equation} and following a complex contour around the EP, i.e.~$\lambda = \lambda_\text{EP} + R \exp(i\theta)$, yields @@ -242,26 +242,33 @@ and we have \end{align} This evidences that encircling non-Hermitian degeneracies at EPs leads to an interconversion of states, and two loops around the EP are necessary to recover the initial energy. -The eigenvectors associated to the energies \eqref{eq:E_2x2} are -\begin{equation} -\phi_{\pm}=\begin{pmatrix} -\frac{1}{2\lambda}(\epsilon_1 - \epsilon_2 \pm \sqrt{(\epsilon_1 - \epsilon_2)^2 + 4\lambda^2}) \\ 1 -\end{pmatrix}, +The eigenvectors associated to the eigenenergies \eqref{eq:E_2x2} are +\begin{equation} \label{eq:phi_2x2} +\phi_{\pm}= + \begin{pmatrix} + E_{\pm}/\lambda + \\ + 1 + \end{pmatrix}, \end{equation} -and for $\lambda=\lambda_\text{EP}$ they become +and, for $\lambda=\lambda_\text{EP}$, they become \begin{equation} \phi_{\pm}=\begin{pmatrix} \mp i \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}, \end{equation} -which are clearly self-orthogonal. The equation (7) can be rewrite as +which are clearly self-orthogonal. +\titou{what do you mean by self-orthogonal?} +Using Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_EP}, Eq.~\eqref{eq:phi_2x2} can be recast as \begin{equation} -\phi_{\pm}=\begin{pmatrix} -\frac{1}{\lambda}(\frac{\epsilon_1 - \epsilon_2}{2} \pm \sqrt{2\lambda_\text{EP}} \sqrt{\lambda - \lambda_\text{EP}}) \\ 1 -\end{pmatrix}, +\phi_{\pm}= + \begin{pmatrix} + E_\text{EP}/\lambda \pm \sqrt{2\lambda_\text{EP}/\lambda} \sqrt{1 - \lambda_\text{EP}/\lambda} + \\ + 1 + \end{pmatrix}, \end{equation} -we can see that if we normalise them they will behave as -$(\lambda - \lambda_\text{EP})^{-1/4}$ resulting in the following pattern when looping around one EP: +where one clearly see that, if normalised, they behave as $(\lambda - \lambda_\text{EP})^{-1/4}$ resulting in the following pattern when looping around one EP: \begin{align} \phi_{\pm}(2\pi) & = \phi_{\mp}(0), & @@ -270,10 +277,9 @@ $(\lambda - \lambda_\text{EP})^{-1/4}$ resulting in the following pattern when l & \phi_{\pm}(8\pi) & = \phi_{\pm}(0), \end{align} -showing that 4 loops around the EP are necessary to recover the initial state. We can also that looping around the other way round leads to a different pattern. -\titou{Maybe you should add a few equations here to highlight the self-orthogonality process. -What do you think? -You could also show that the behaviour of the wave function when one follows the complex contour around the EP.} +\titou{I don't think it is too obvious that the eigenvectors behave as $(\lambda - \lambda_\text{EP})^{-1/4}$.} +In plain words, four loops around the EP are necessary to recover the initial state. +We can also see that looping the other way around leads to a different pattern. %============================================================% \section{Perturbation theory}