Fix merge
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f5337195f
commit
9285a7a8c0
@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ The analysis of the poles of the integrand in Eq.~\eqref{eq:wtilde} yields
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\times \qty[ \frac{1}{\Om{ib}{S} - \Om{m}{\RPA} + i\eta} + \frac{1}{\Om{ja}{S} - \Om{m}{\RPA} + i\eta} ].
|
||||
\end{multline}
|
||||
|
||||
One can verify that, in the static limit where $\Om{m}{\RPA} \to \infty$, the matrix elements $\widetilde{W}_{ij,ab}$ correctly reduce to their static expression
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:Wstat}
|
||||
@ -535,7 +534,7 @@ One can verify that, in the static limit where $\Om{m}{\RPA} \to \infty$, the ma
|
||||
evidencing that the standard static BSE problem is recovered from the present dynamical formalism in this limit.
|
||||
|
||||
Due to excitonic effects, the lowest BSE excitation energy, $\Om{1}{}$, stands lower than the lowest RPA excitation energy, $\Om{1}{\RPA}$, so that, $\Om{ib}{S} - \Om{m}{\RPA} < 0 $ and $\widetilde{W}_{ij,ab}(\Om{S}{})$ has no resonances.
|
||||
This property holds for a few low lying $\Om{s}{}$ excitations but special care must be taken for higher ones.
|
||||
This property holds for low-lying excitations but special care must be taken for higher ones.
|
||||
Furthermore, $\Om{ib}{S}$ and $\Om{ja}{S}$ are necessarily negative quantities for in-gap low-lying BSE excitations.
|
||||
Thus, we have $\abs*{\Om{ib}{S} - \Om{m}{\RPA}} > \Om{m}{\RPA}$.
|
||||
As a consequence, we observe a reduction of the electron-hole screening, \ie, an enhancement of electron-hole binding energy, as compared to the standard static BSE, and consequently smaller (red-shifted) excitation energies.
|
||||
@ -743,7 +742,7 @@ The $GW$ calculations performed to obtain the screened Coulomb operator and the
|
||||
Perturbative $GW$ (or {\GOWO}) \cite{Hybertsen_1985a, Hybertsen_1986} quasiparticle energies are employed as starting points to compute the BSE neutral excitations.
|
||||
These quasiparticle energies are obtained by linearizing the frequency-dependent quasiparticle equation, and the entire set of orbitals is corrected.
|
||||
Further details about our implementation of {\GOWO} can be found in Refs.~\onlinecite{Loos_2018b,Veril_2018}.
|
||||
Note that, for the present (small) molecular systems, {\GOWO}@HF and ev$GW$@HF yield similar quasiparticle energies.
|
||||
Note that, for the present (small) molecular systems, {\GOWO}@HF and ev$GW$@HF yield similar quasiparticle energies and fundamental gap.
|
||||
Moreover, {\GOWO} allows to avoid rather laborious iterations as well as the significant additional computational effort of ev$GW$.
|
||||
As one-electron basis sets, we employ the augmented Dunning family (aug-cc-pVXZ) defined with cartesian Gaussian functions.
|
||||
Finally, the infinitesimal $\eta$ is set to $100$ meV for all calculations.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user