diff --git a/BSEdyn.bib b/BSEdyn.bib
index b503245..00bb7f2 100644
--- a/BSEdyn.bib
+++ b/BSEdyn.bib
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 %% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
 %% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
 
-%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2020-05-19 16:23:54 +0200 
+%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2020-05-19 17:13:25 +0200 
 
 
 %% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8) 
diff --git a/BSEdyn.tex b/BSEdyn.tex
index 37c7f31..4d73be4 100644
--- a/BSEdyn.tex
+++ b/BSEdyn.tex
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
 \newcommand{\RPA}{\text{RPA}}
 \newcommand{\BSE}{\text{BSE}}
 \newcommand{\GW}{GW}
+\newcommand{\stat}{\text{stat}}
+\newcommand{\dyn}{\text{dyn}}
 
 % energies
 \newcommand{\Enuc}{E^\text{nuc}}
@@ -86,6 +88,7 @@
 \newcommand{\eevGW}[1]{\epsilon^\text{\evGW}_{#1}}
 \newcommand{\eGnWn}[2]{\epsilon^\text{\GnWn{#2}}_{#1}}
 \newcommand{\Om}[2]{\Omega_{#1}^{#2}}
+\newcommand{\tOm}[2]{\Tilde{\Omega}_{#1}^{#2}}
 
 % Matrix elements
 \newcommand{\A}[2]{A_{#1}^{#2}}
@@ -171,6 +174,9 @@
 \newcommand{\EgOpt}{\Eg^\text{opt}}
 \newcommand{\EB}{E_B}
 
+\newcommand{\pis}{\pi^*}
+\newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}
+
 \newcommand\vari{{\varepsilon}_i}
 \newcommand\vara{{\varepsilon}_a}
 \newcommand\varj{{\varepsilon}_j}
@@ -583,8 +589,9 @@ This correction can be renormalized by computing, at basically no extra cost, th
 \end{equation}
 which finally yields
 \begin{equation}
-	\Om{m}{} \approx \Om{m}{(0)} + Z_{m} \Om{m}{(1)}.
+	\Om{m}{\text{dyn}} = \Om{m}{\text{stat}} + \Delta\Om{m}{\text{dyn}} = \Om{m}{(0)} + Z_{m} \Om{m}{(1)}.
 \end{equation}
+with $\Om{m}{\text{stat}} \equiv \Om{m}{(0)}$ and $\Delta\Om{m}{\text{dyn}} = Z_{m} \Om{m}{(1)}$.
 This is our final expression.
 
 %%% FIG 1 %%%
@@ -618,7 +625,7 @@ Further details about our implementation of {\GOWO} and {\evGW} can be found in
 As one-electron basis sets, we employ the augmented Dunning family (aug-cc-pVXZ) defined with cartesian Gaussian functions. 
 Finally, the infinitesimal $\eta$ is set to $100$ meV for all calculations.
 
-For comparison purposes, we employ the theoretical best estimates and geometries of Ref.~\onlinecite{Loos_2018a} from which coupled cluster (CC) excitation energies,  namely, CC2 \cite{Christiansen_1995}, CCSD, \cite{Purvis_1982} and CC3, \cite{Christiansen_1995b} are also extracted.
+For comparison purposes, we employ the theoretical best estimates and geometries of Refs.~\onlinecite{Loos_2018a,Loos_2019,Loos_2020b} from which coupled cluster (CC) excitation energies,  namely, CC2 \cite{Christiansen_1995}, CCSD, \cite{Purvis_1982} and CC3, \cite{Christiansen_1995b} are also extracted.
 All the BSE calculations have been performed with our locally developed $GW$ software, \texttt{QuAcK}, \cite{QuAcK} freely available on \texttt{github}, where the present perturbative correction has been implemented.
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
@@ -626,6 +633,46 @@ All the BSE calculations have been performed with our locally developed $GW$ sof
 \label{sec:resdis}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
+\begin{table*}
+	\caption{
+	BSE excitation energies for various molecules obtained with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.
+	\label{tab:BigTab}
+	}
+	\begin{ruledtabular}
+		\begin{tabular}{lccccccccccc}
+						&			&	\mc{4}{c}{BSE@{\GOWO}@HF}	&	\mc{4}{c}{BSE@{\evGW}@HF}	\\
+													\cline{4-7}	\cline{8-11}
+			Mol.		&	State	&	$\Om{m}{\stat}$	&	$\Om{m}{\dyn}$	&	$\Delta\Om{m}{\dyn}$	&	$Z_{m}$	
+												&	$\Om{m}{\stat}$	&	$\Om{m}{\dyn}$	&	$\Delta\Om{m}{\dyn}$	&	$Z_{m}$		&	CC2	&	CC3	\\
+			\hline
+			\ce{HCl}	&	$^1\Pi$(CT)\\
+			\ce{H2O}	&	\\
+			\ce{N2}		&	$^1\Pi_g(n \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^1\Sigma_u^-(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^1\Delta_u(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3\Sigma_u^+(\pi \ra \pis)$\\
+						&	$^3\Pi_g(n \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3\Delta_u(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3\Sigma_u^-(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+			\ce{CO}		&	$^1\Pi(n \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^1\Sigma^-(\pi \ra \pis)$				\\
+						&	$^1\Delta(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3\Pi(n \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3\Sigma^+(\pi \ra \pis)$\\
+						&	$^3\Delta(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3\Sigma_u^-(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+			\ce{HNO}	&	\\
+			\ce{CH2O}	&	\\
+			\ce{C2H4}	&	$^1B_{3u}(\pi \ra 3s)$	\\
+						&	$^1B_{1u}(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^1B_{1g}(\pi \ra 3p)$	\\
+						&	$^3B_{1u}(\pi \ra \pis)$	\\
+						&	$^3B_{3u}(\pi \ra 3s)$	\\
+						&	$^3B_{1g}(\pi \ra 3p)$	\\
+		\end{tabular}
+	\end{ruledtabular}
+\end{table*}
+
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 \section{Conclusion}
 \label{sec:conclusion}