minor corrections
This commit is contained in:
parent
7684015793
commit
17042342e7
@ -1121,9 +1121,10 @@ To provide further insight into the magnitude of the dynamical correction to val
|
|||||||
The dynamical correction associated with the HOMO-LUMO transition reads
|
The dynamical correction associated with the HOMO-LUMO transition reads
|
||||||
\begin{equation*}
|
\begin{equation*}
|
||||||
\W{hh,ll}{\text{stat}} - \widetilde{W}_{hh,ll}( \Om{1}{} )
|
\W{hh,ll}{\text{stat}} - \widetilde{W}_{hh,ll}( \Om{1}{} )
|
||||||
= 4 \sERI{hh}{hl} \sERI{ll}{hl} \frac{ \Om{hl}{1} - 2 \OmRPA{hl}{}}{\OmRPA{hl}{} ( \OmRPA{hl}{} - \Om{hl}{1} ) },
|
% = 4 \sERI{hh}{hl} \sERI{ll}{hl} \frac{ \Om{hl}{1} - 2 \OmRPA{hl}{}}{\OmRPA{hl} ( \OmRPA{hl}{} - \Om{hl}{1} ) },
|
||||||
|
= - 4 \sERI{hh}{hl} \sERI{ll}{hl} \qty( \frac{1}{\OmRPA{hl}} - \frac{1}{\Om{hl}{1} - \OmRPA{hl}} ),
|
||||||
\end{equation*}
|
\end{equation*}
|
||||||
where the only RPA excitation energy, $\Om{1}{}$, is again the HOMO-LUMO transition, \ie, $m=hl$ [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:sERI}].
|
where the only RPA excitation energy, $\OmRPA{hl} = \e{l} - \e{h} + 2 \ERI{hl}{lh}$, is again the HOMO-LUMO transition, \ie, $m=hl$ [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:sERI}].
|
||||||
For CT excitations with vanishing HOMO-LUMO overlap [\ie, $\ERI{h}{l} \approx 0$], $\sERI{hh}{hl} \approx 0$ and $\sERI{ll}{hl} \approx 0$, so that one can expect the dynamical correction to be weak.
|
For CT excitations with vanishing HOMO-LUMO overlap [\ie, $\ERI{h}{l} \approx 0$], $\sERI{hh}{hl} \approx 0$ and $\sERI{ll}{hl} \approx 0$, so that one can expect the dynamical correction to be weak.
|
||||||
Likewise, Rydberg transitions which are characterized by a delocalized LUMO state, that is, a small HOMO-LUMO overlap, are expected to undergo weak dynamical corrections.
|
Likewise, Rydberg transitions which are characterized by a delocalized LUMO state, that is, a small HOMO-LUMO overlap, are expected to undergo weak dynamical corrections.
|
||||||
The discussion for $\pi \ra \pis$ and $n \ra \pis$ transitions is certainly more complex and molecule-specific symmetry arguments must be invoked to understand the magnitude of the $\sERI{hh}{hl}$ and $\sERI{ll}{hl}$ terms.
|
The discussion for $\pi \ra \pis$ and $n \ra \pis$ transitions is certainly more complex and molecule-specific symmetry arguments must be invoked to understand the magnitude of the $\sERI{hh}{hl}$ and $\sERI{ll}{hl}$ terms.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user