mirror of
https://github.com/QuantumPackage/qp2.git
synced 2024-08-15 05:58:29 +02:00
176 lines
7.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
176 lines
7.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
Selected Configuration Interaction
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. default-role:: cite
|
||
|
|
||
|
These methods rely on the same principle as the usual |CI| approaches, except
|
||
|
that determinants aren't chosen *a priori* based on an occupation or
|
||
|
excitation criterion, but selected *on the fly* among the entire set of
|
||
|
determinants based on their estimated contribution to the |FCI| wave function.
|
||
|
It has been noticed long ago that, even inside a predefined subspace of
|
||
|
determinants, only a small number significantly contributes to the wave
|
||
|
function. `Bytautas_2009,Anderson_2018` Therefore, an *on the fly*
|
||
|
selection of determinants is a rather natural idea that has been proposed
|
||
|
in the late 60's by Bender and Davidson `Bender_1969` as well as Whitten
|
||
|
and Hackmeyer. `Whitten_1969`
|
||
|
|
||
|
The approach we are using in the |qp| is based on |CIPSI| developed by Huron,
|
||
|
Rancurel and Malrieu, `Huron_1973` that iteratively selects *external*
|
||
|
determinants (determinants which are not present in the variational space)
|
||
|
using a perturbative criterion.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is however a computational downside. In *a priori* selected
|
||
|
methods, the rule by which determinants are selected is known *a
|
||
|
priori*, and therefore, one can map a particular determinant to some row or
|
||
|
column index. `Knowles_1984` As a consequence, it can be systematically
|
||
|
determined to which matrix element of :math:`\hat H` a two-electron integral
|
||
|
contributes. This allows for the implementation of so-called
|
||
|
*integral-driven* methods, that work essentially by iterating over
|
||
|
integrals and are very fast.
|
||
|
|
||
|
On the contrary, in selected methods an explicit list of determinants has to be
|
||
|
kept, and there is no immediate way to know whether a determinant has been
|
||
|
selected, or what its index is in the list. Consequently, a
|
||
|
*determinant-driven* approach will be used, in which the loops run over
|
||
|
determinants rather than integrals. This can be a lot more computationally
|
||
|
expensive since the number of determinants is typically much larger than the
|
||
|
number of integrals.
|
||
|
|
||
|
What makes *determinant-driven* approaches possible here is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- the fact that selected |CI| methods will keep the number of determinants small
|
||
|
enough, orders of magnitude smaller than in *a priori* selected methods for
|
||
|
wave functions with equal energies,
|
||
|
- an efficient way to compare determinants in order to extract the
|
||
|
corresponding excitation operators `Scemama_2013`,
|
||
|
- an intense filtering of the internal space to avoid as much as possible
|
||
|
determinant comparisons of disconnected determinants,
|
||
|
- a fast retrieval of the corresponding two-electron integrals in memory.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Simple Algorithm
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. default-role:: math
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. |SetDI| replace:: `\{|D_I\rangle\}^{(n)}`
|
||
|
.. |Psi_n| replace:: `|\Psi^{(n)}\rangle`
|
||
|
.. |H| replace:: `\hat H`
|
||
|
.. |kalpha| replace:: `|\alpha\rangle`
|
||
|
.. |kalpha_star| replace:: `\{ |\alpha \rangle \}_\star ^{(n)}`
|
||
|
.. |ealpha| replace:: `e_\alpha`
|
||
|
.. |EPT| replace:: `E_\text{PT2}`
|
||
|
|
||
|
The variational wave function |Psi_n| is defined over a set of determinants
|
||
|
|SetDI| in which we diagonalize |H|.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. math::
|
||
|
|
||
|
|\Psi^{(n)}\rangle = \sum_{I} c_I^{(n)} |D_I\rangle
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
The determinants in |SetDI| will be characterized as **internal**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. For all **external** determinants |kalpha| `\notin` |SetDI|, compute the
|
||
|
Epstein-Nesbet second-order perturbative contribution to the energy
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. math::
|
||
|
|
||
|
e_\alpha = \frac{ \langle \Psi^{(n)}| {\hat H} | \alpha \rangle^2 }{E^{(n)} - \langle \alpha | {\hat H} | \alpha \rangle }.
|
||
|
|
||
|
`E^{(n)}` is the variational energy of the wave function at the current
|
||
|
iteration. Note that another perturbation theory could be used to estimate
|
||
|
|ealpha|.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. An estimate of the total missing correlation energy can be computed
|
||
|
by summing all the |ealpha| contributions
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. math::
|
||
|
|
||
|
E_\text{PT2} & = \sum_{\alpha} e_\alpha \\
|
||
|
E_\text{FCI} & \approx E + E_\text{PT2}
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. |kalpha_star|, the subset of determinants |kalpha| with the largest
|
||
|
contributions |ealpha|, is added to the variational space
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. math::
|
||
|
|
||
|
\{ |D_I \rangle \}^{(n+1)} = \{|D_I\rangle\}^{(n)} \cup \{ |\alpha\rangle \}_\star^{(n)}
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
#. Go to iteration n+1, or exit on some criterion (number of determinants in
|
||
|
the wave function, low |EPT|, ...).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Of course, such a procedure can be applied on any state and therefore can allow to treat both ground and excited states.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Stochastic approximations for the selection and the computation of |EPT|
|
||
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The simple algorithm would be too slow to make calculations possible. Instead,
|
||
|
the |QP| uses a stochastic algorithm :cite:`Garniron_2017.2` in order to compute
|
||
|
efficiently the |EPT| and to select on-the-fly the best Slater determinants.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In such a way, the selection step introduces no extra cost with respect to the |EPT| calculation and the |EPT|
|
||
|
itself is unbiased but associated with a statistical error bar rapidly converging.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Deterministic approximations for the selection
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following description was used in a previous version of the |CIPSI| algorithm
|
||
|
which was less efficient. Nonetheless, it introduces the notions of **generator** and **selector** determinants
|
||
|
which are much more general than the |CIPSI| algorithm that targets the |FCI| and can be used to realize virtually
|
||
|
**any kind of CI in a selected way**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
We define **generator** determinants, as determinants of the internal space
|
||
|
from which the |kalpha| are generated.
|
||
|
We then define **selector** determinants, a truncated wave function
|
||
|
used in the computation of |ealpha|.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For calculations in the |FCI| space, the determinants are sorted by decreasing
|
||
|
`|c_I|^2`, and thresholds are used on the squared norm of the wave function.
|
||
|
The default is to use :option:`determinants threshold_generators` = 0.99 for
|
||
|
the generators, and :option:`determinants threshold_selectors` = 0.999 for the
|
||
|
selectors.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is nothing but the 3-class |CIPSI| approximation to accelerate the selection,
|
||
|
:cite:`Evangelisti_1983` where instead of generating all possible |kalpha|,
|
||
|
we only generate a subset which are likely to be selected.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
The computation of |EPT| using a truncated wave function is biased,
|
||
|
so if an accurate estimate of the |FCI| energy is desired, it is preferable
|
||
|
to recompute |EPT| with the hybrid deterministic/stochastic algorithm
|
||
|
:cite:`Garniron_2017b` which is unbiased (this is the default).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Modifying the selection space
|
||
|
-----------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
By changing the definition of generators, and the rules for the generation of
|
||
|
the |kalpha|, it is easy to define selected variants of traditional |CI| methods.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For example, if one defines the |HF| determinant as the only generator,
|
||
|
one will produce a selected |CISD|. If one also changes the rules for the generation
|
||
|
to generate only the double excitations, one will have a selected |CID|.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The generators can also be chosen as determinants belonging to a |CAS|. If the
|
||
|
rules allow only for excitations inside the |CAS|, we obtain a selected
|
||
|
|CAS| |CI|. If the rules allow for excitations in the |FCI| space, we obtain
|
||
|
a selected |CAS-SD|. And if one add the rule to prevent for doing double
|
||
|
excitations with two holes and two particles outside of the active space, one
|
||
|
obtains a selected |DDCI| method.
|
||
|
|
||
|
All such things can be done very easily when programming the |qp|.
|
||
|
|
||
|
-----------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. bibliography:: selected.bib
|
||
|
:style: unsrt
|
||
|
:labelprefix: A
|
||
|
|
||
|
|