mirror of
https://github.com/QuantumPackage/qp2.git
synced 2024-09-12 10:48:31 +02:00
113 lines
4.9 KiB
Org Mode
113 lines
4.9 KiB
Org Mode
![]() |
#+TITLE: CFG CIPSI
|
||
|
#+AUTHOR: Vijay Gopal Chilkuri (vijay.gopal.c@gmail.com)
|
||
|
#+DATE: <2020-12-08 Tue 08:27>
|
||
|
|
||
|
#+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{braket}
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Theoretical background
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here we describe the main theoretical background and definitions of the
|
||
|
Configuration (CFG) based CIPSI algorithm. The outline of the document is as follows.
|
||
|
First, we give some definitions of the CFG many-particle basis follwed by the
|
||
|
definitions of the overlap, one-particle, and two-particle matrix-elements. Finally,
|
||
|
an algorithm is presented for the sigma-vector (\[ \sigma \]-vector defined later) calculation using
|
||
|
the CFG basis.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Definitino of CI basis
|
||
|
|
||
|
In CFG based CIPSI, the wavefunction is represented in CFG basis as shown in Eq:\[~\ref{Eq:definebasis1}\].
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:definebasis1}
|
||
|
\ket{\psi} &= \sum_{ij} c_{ij} ^s\ket{\phi^j_i}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
where the \[\ket{\Phi^j_i}\] represent Configuration State Functions (CSFs)
|
||
|
which are expanded in terms of Bonded functions (BFs) as shown in
|
||
|
Eq:\[~\ref{Eq:definebasis2}\].
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:definebasis2}
|
||
|
\ket{\Phi^j_i} &= \sum^j_{i,k} O^j_{i,k} \ket{^S\phi_k(i,j)}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Where the functions \[\ket{^S\phi_k(i,j)}\] represent the BFs for the CFG
|
||
|
\[i\]. Each CFG contains a list of CSFs related to it which describes the
|
||
|
spin part of the wavefunction (see Eq:~\ref{Eq:definebasis3}) which is
|
||
|
encoded in the BFs as shown below in Eq:~\ref{Eq:definebasis5}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:definebasis3}
|
||
|
\ket{^S\Phi_i} = \left\{ \ket{^S\Phi^1_i}, \ket{^S\Phi^2_i}, \dots, \ket{^s\phi^{n_{csf}}_i} \right}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{eq:definebasis4}
|
||
|
\ket{^s\phi_i} = \left\{ c^1_i, c^1_i, \dots, c^{N_{CSF}}_i \right\}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Each of the CSFs belonging to the CFG \[\ket{^S\Phi_i}\] have coefficients
|
||
|
associated to them as shown in Eq:~\ref{Eq:definebasis4}. Crucially, the bonded functions
|
||
|
defined in Eq:~\ref{Eq:definebasis5} are not northogonal to each other.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:definebasis4}
|
||
|
\ket{^S\phi_k(i,j)} = (i\bar{i})\dots (j,k) l m
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
The bonded functions are made up of products of slater determinants. There are
|
||
|
three types of determinants, first, the closed shell pairs \[(i\bar{i})\]. Second,
|
||
|
the open-shell singlet pairs \[(i,j)\] which are expanded as \[(i,j) = \frac{\ket{i\bar{j}}-\ket{\bar{i}j}}{\sqrt{2}}\]. Third, the
|
||
|
open-shell SOMOs which are coupled parallel and account for the total spin of the
|
||
|
wavefunction \[(l (m \dots\]. They are shown as open brackets.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Overlap of the wavefunction
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once the wavefunction has been expanded in terms of the CSFs, the most fundamental
|
||
|
operation is to calculate the overlap between two states. The overlap in the
|
||
|
basis of CSFs is defined as shown in Eq:~\ref{Eq:defineovlp1}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:defineovlp1}
|
||
|
\braket{^S\Phi_i|^S\Phi_j} = \sum_{kl} C_i C_j \braket{^S\Psi^k_i|^S\Psi^l_j}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Where the sum is over the CSFs \[k\] and \[l\] corresponding to the \[i\]
|
||
|
and \[j\] CFGs respectively. The overlap between the CSFs can be expanded in terms
|
||
|
of the BFs using the definition given in Eq:~\ref{Eq:definebasis2} and Eq:~\ref{Eq:definebasis3}
|
||
|
as given in Eq:~\ref{Eq:defineovlp2}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:defineovlp2}
|
||
|
\braket{^S\Phi^k_i|^S\Phi^l_j} = \sum_m \sum_n \left( O^k_{i,m}\right)^{\dagger} \braket{^S\phi_m(i,k)|^S\phi_n(j,l)} O^l_{j,n}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Therefore, the overlap between two CSFs can be expanded in terms of the overlap
|
||
|
between the constituent BFs. The overlap matrix \[S_{mn}\] is of dimension \[\left( N^k_{N_{BF}} , N^l_{N_{BF}} \rigth)\].
|
||
|
The equation shown above (Eq:~\ref{Eq:defineovlp2}) can be written in marix-form as
|
||
|
shown below in Eq:~\ref{Eq:defineovlp3}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
\label{Eq:defineovlp3}
|
||
|
\braket{^S\Phi_i|^S\Phi_j} = \left( C_{i,1} \right)^{\dagger} \mathbf{O}_i\cdot\mathbf{S}_{ij}\cdot\mathbf{O}_j C_{j,1}
|
||
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note that the overlap between two CFGs does not depend on the orbital
|
||
|
labels. It only depends on the number of Singly Occupied Molecular Orbitals
|
||
|
(SOMOs) therefore it can be pretabulated. Actually, it is possible to
|
||
|
redefine the CSFs in terms of a linear combination of BFs such that
|
||
|
\[S_{ij}\] becomes the identity matrix. In this case, one needs to store the
|
||
|
orthogonalization matrix \[\mathbf{\tilde{O}}_i\] which is given by
|
||
|
\[\mathbf{O}_i\cdot S^{1/2}_i\] for a given CFG \[i\]. Note that the a CFG
|
||
|
\[i\] is by definition of an orthonormal set of MOs automatically orthogonal
|
||
|
to a CFG \[j\] with a different occupation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Definition of matrix-elements
|
||
|
|
||
|
The matrix-element (ME) evaluation follows a similar logic.
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Local variables:
|
||
|
# after-save-hook: org-preview-latex-fragment
|
||
|
# end:
|